• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually don’t agree, and the reason is - non tech people. You and me can install plugins but ordinary people don’t do that. So the default experience must be good, offering improvements to the experience over Google Chrome.

    Otherwise all privacy features could also be plugins. Imagine if that was true. Firefox would have no identity and you would have to install plugins and make it your own.

    So some features should be built in. Maybe the ability to get pop-ups about false reviews will actually make users go “wow that is so useful”.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Compromise: Develop it as a Plugin and then install it by default. That way people who don’t want the feature can easily remove it completely. That approach would likely also reduce the number of Firefox forks whose sole purpose is to remove the new features some consider bloat.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Now, let’s talk about adblockers… Oh, wait, Google would get upset if FF had an inbuilt adblocker and could stop giving us those $weet money…

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Google stopped sponsoring, Mozilla would go down and Google would get slammed with anti-monopoly lawsuits from the EU.

        So Mozilla can do whatever they want and Google won’t stop sending them money. Since that is a lot more profitable in the long run.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mozilla can do whatever they want and Google won’t stop sending them money.

          So… What are they waiting for? Are they going to rely on gorhill for ever?