so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They don’t package LTS kernels which is pretty concerning—especially if using out-of-kernel modules that don’t always get released in lock step that could leave you with a machine that won’t boot.

    • nickiam2@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s true. i do sometimes have issues with the ZFS package not compiling because of a too new kernel not being supported yet.