eldritch_horror@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 年前What are the pros and cons of cancelling democracy and putting the smart people in charge?message-squaremessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareWhat are the pros and cons of cancelling democracy and putting the smart people in charge?eldritch_horror@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareericbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 年前Who decides what is on the smartness test? Who writes it? Who grades it? IQ tests are more and more being considered trash. Also people with high iq doesn’t mean they are educated, just means they are quick learners when they wann.
minus-squareeldritch_horror@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 年前who speaks entirely in rhetorical questions?
minus-squareericbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 年前These aren’t rherorical. These are logistical questions that would have to be answered.
minus-squareeldritch_horror@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 年前Your questions sum to “I don’t think there’s a good smartness test”. This social media convention of framing your assertions as questions is exhausting.
minus-squareericbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 年前So the con is there is no way to determine who is the smartest. There is no good smart test. If you disagree though I’m happy to hear about it, as this is a silly debate I have no stake in.
minus-squareeldritch_horror@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 年前Yes, you already said that. Your conversational technique is abysmal. I blame society.
Who decides what is on the smartness test? Who writes it? Who grades it? IQ tests are more and more being considered trash. Also people with high iq doesn’t mean they are educated, just means they are quick learners when they wann.
who speaks entirely in rhetorical questions?
These aren’t rherorical. These are logistical questions that would have to be answered.
Your questions sum to “I don’t think there’s a good smartness test”.
This social media convention of framing your assertions as questions is exhausting.
So the con is there is no way to determine who is the smartest. There is no good smart test.
If you disagree though I’m happy to hear about it, as this is a silly debate I have no stake in.
Yes, you already said that.
Your conversational technique is abysmal. I blame society.