dd56@futurology.today to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoThoughts on this?futurology.todayimagemessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageThoughts on this?futurology.todaydd56@futurology.today to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago X.Org developers moved to Wayland, they were the ones who made it happen. But did they bring the same mistakes with them?
minus-squareAMDIsOurLord@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThey made Wayland the way it is precisely to NOT make the same mistake.
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoMost of the xorg “mistakes” are design choices in the x11 protocol and have been there since some MIT undergrad smoked too much ganja over Christmas break 1986 and wrote the implementation that became the de facto standard.
But did they bring the same mistakes with them?
They made Wayland the way it is precisely to NOT make the same mistake.
Most of the xorg “mistakes” are design choices in the x11 protocol and have been there since some MIT undergrad smoked too much ganja over Christmas break 1986 and wrote the implementation that became the de facto standard.