dd56@futurology.today to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoThoughts on this?futurology.todayimagemessage-square85linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageThoughts on this?futurology.todaydd56@futurology.today to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square85linkfedilink
minus-square520@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years ago X.Org developers moved to Wayland, they were the ones who made it happen. But did they bring the same mistakes with them?
minus-squareAMDIsOurLord@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoThey made Wayland the way it is precisely to NOT make the same mistake.
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 years agoMost of the xorg “mistakes” are design choices in the x11 protocol and have been there since some MIT undergrad smoked too much ganja over Christmas break 1986 and wrote the implementation that became the de facto standard.
But did they bring the same mistakes with them?
They made Wayland the way it is precisely to NOT make the same mistake.
Most of the xorg “mistakes” are design choices in the x11 protocol and have been there since some MIT undergrad smoked too much ganja over Christmas break 1986 and wrote the implementation that became the de facto standard.