Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoStand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoLotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoThey attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoThat’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoOr “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Lotters? Is this some vernacular I’m unfamiliar with?
It says, in fact, LOπERS.
LOPIERS
WILL BE SH∞T ON SIGHT
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
What’s a loiter?
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?