• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hello, fellow humans. I too am human, just like you! I have skin, and blood, and guts inside me, which is not at all disgusting. Just another day of human!

    Won’t you share a delicious cup of motor oil lemonaide with me? It’s nice and refridgerated, so it will cool down our bodies without the use of cooling fans!

    However we too can use cooling fans. They will just be placed on the ceiling, or in a box, or self standing, and oscillating. Not at all inside our bodies, connected to a board controlled by our CPUs that we clearly don’t have!

    Now come, let us take our colored paper with numbers and pictures of previous human rulers and exchange them for human food prepared by not fully adult humans who haven’t matured to the age where their brains develop the ability to care about food sanitation. Then we shall complain that our meal cost too many paper dollars, while recieving less and less potato stick products every year. Ignoring completely the risk of heart disease by indulging in the amounts of food we desire to aquire.

    Finally we shall retreat to our place of residence, and complain on the internet that our elected leaders are performing poorly. Rather than terminate the program vote the poor performing humans out, we shall instead complain that it is other humans fault for voting them in. Making no attempt to change our broken system that has been broken our entire existence, with no signs of improving. Instead every 4 years we will make an effort to write down names of people we’ve already complained about in the hopes that enough people write down the same names, and that will fix the problem.

    Oh. Shall I request amazon.com to purchase more fans and cooling units? The news being reported that tempatures will soon reach 130F on a regular basis, and all humans will slowly perish.

    Shall I share photographs of the new CEO of starbucks who’s daily commute involves a personal jet aircraft, which surely isn’t compounding the problem at all?

  • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    At the very least it failed in a way that’s obvious by giving you contradictory statements. If it left you with only the wrong statements, that’s when “AI” becomes really insidiuos.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can do this with practically any versus question and get hilarious results

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah I should have mentioned the context is FBLA, and Google partially fixed the prompt.

        Original from a few weeks ago:

        BPA is another student org called Business Professionals of America

        The AI ignores the subject context and just compares whatever is the most common acronym.

        They lazy patched it by making the model do a subject check on the result, but not on the prompt so it still comes back with the chemical lol.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I switched to duckduckgo before this bullshit, but this would 100% make me switch if I hadn’t already.

    Who wants random ai gibberish to be the first thing they see?

    • Vince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Better than an Ad I guess? Not sure if my searches haven’t returned any AI stuff like this or if my brain is already ignoring them like ads.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The plan is to monetize the AI results with ads.

        I’m not even sure how that works, but I don’t like it.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If search engines don’t improve to address the AI problem, most of the Internet will be AI gibberish.

      • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The internet as we knew it is doomed to be full of ai garbage. It’s a signal to noise ratio issue. It’s also part of the reason the fediverse and smaller moderated interconnected communities are so important: it keeps users more honest by making moderators more common and, if you want to, you can strictly moderate against AI generated content.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The good thing about that is that this kills the LLMs, since new models can only be trained on this LLM generated gibberish, which makes the gibberish they’ll generate even more garbled and useless, and so on, until every model you try to train can only produce random useless unintelligible garbage.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      DuckDuckGo started showing AI results for me.

      I think it uses the bing engine iirc.

      • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And you can use multiple models, which I find handy.

        There is some stuff that AI, or rather LLM search, is useful for, at least the time being.

        Sometimes you need some information that would require clicking through a lot of sources just to find one that has what you need. With DDG, I can ask the question to their four models, using four different Firefox containers, copy and paste.

        See how their answers align, and then identify keywords from their responses that help me craft a precise search query to identify the obscure primary source I need.

        This is especially useful when you don’t know the subject that you’re searching about very well.

  • Neo@lemmy.hacktheplanet.be
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I checked it, it’s true. Side note: it’s “the saté of AI.” FTFY. From what I’ve heard it’s even better than 🍿to sit back and watch this farce unfold.

  • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s nothing contradictory in what is written there.

    “The XTX is better - but you don’t deserve it, bitch”

  • wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here is what kagi delivers with the same prompt:

    NB: quick answer is only generated when ending your search with a question mark

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And even if it’s showing the correct number, you can’t be sure how trustworthy the source is.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This applies to any information though, it’s got nothing to do with LLMs specifically.

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not really, no. Sources of infornation gain a reputation as time goes on. So, even though you should still check with multiple sources, you can sort of know if a certain bit of information is likely to be correct or not.

            On the other hand, LLM’s will quote different sources and sometimes it will only provide them if you ask it to. Even then it sometimes hallucinates the sources so there’s that.

      • wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        At least it’s citing sources and you can check to make sure. And from my anecdotal evidence it has been pretty good so far. It also told me on some occasions that the queried information was not found in it’s sources instead of just making something up. But it’s not perfect for sure, it’s always better to do manual research but for a first impression and to find some entry points I’ve found it useful so far

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is that you need to check those sources today make sure it’s not just making up bullshit and at that point you didn’t gain anything from the genai

          • wurstgulasch3000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            As I said the links provide some entry points for further research. It’s providing some use to me because I don’t need to check every search result. But to each their own and I understand the general scepticism of generative “AI”

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you don’t check everyone source. It might be just bullshitting you. There’s people who followed your approach and got into hot shots with their bosses and judges

              • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                There is absolutely value in something compiling sources for you to personally review. Anyone who cannot use AI efficiently is analogous to someone who can’t see the utility in a graphing calculator. It’s not magic, it’s a tool. And tools need to be used precisely, and for appropriate purposes.

                My plumber fucks up I don’t blame his wrench. My lawyers don’t vet their case work, I blame them.

                • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s an LLM. Odds are it’s hallucinating the sources and they don’t even exist.

                  Know what does compile sources for you which are guaranteed to exist and be related to what you’re looking for…? A good old not LLM infected search engine.

                  If my plumber replaces their wrench for a rabid gerbil claiming it’ll be just as good I’m definitely changing plumbers.

            • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The sources are the same result of the search? Or at least the top results?

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          When I query an AI I always end with “provide sources and bibliography for your reply”. That seems to get better replies.

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a good summary. Google Gemini is no better. Type in a question and it starts off great but then devolves into other brands, other steps to do something that isn’t related to the thing you asked. It’s just terrible and someone will sue them over it next year. Just wait.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah AI can be wonky, but what idiot would spend a shitload of money on a graphics card without even being willing to click an article and read a bit?

    It’s on you if you do that. Even if the AI shit worked way better, why would you trust there aren’t shady things happening to influence the AI and have you spend more money.

    • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My dad falls into this category he constantly replaces things with way worse things just because they are new, I can’t get my mind how he can replace really good working stuff with new junk that isn’t even capable of doing the job .

      Wish I was joking but he does this constantly.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thats where you say “hey dad do you still need this janky old…”

        Then when the new stuf breaks you can come over and be the hero using his old reliable stuff.

        • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          If only he tends to give these things to the conmen installing the junk. I’ve tried to stop him wasting his money so many times but it’s futile I’ve tried to use his latest oven he had an amazing one before but when I tried to use the new one following every instruction he said and the actual manual I looked up online myself the food came out later absolutely fridge cold.

          He insists his new cooker is brilliant, what can you do with that response to something that’s obviously broken from new and he should be returning.

          He might need a home but I can’t do that to him truthfully, I just wish he had some common sense when it comes to things like appliances etc.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m sorry but we’re going to have to send that to the English teachers to see if it’s really one word…

          • hakase@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            (on mobile, so sorry for any formatting weirdness)

            English teachers will only give you an arbitrary, subjective answer about whether it’s a word - you want a linguist if you want an objective answer.

            Since we’re dealing with two different “words” (roots) here, factory and overclocked, the first thing to look for is compound stress. Many compound words in English get initial stress: compare “blackbird” and “a black bird”.

            This isn’t foolproof, however. For some speakers there are compounds that don’t get compound stress - some speakers say “paper towel” as expected, while others say “paper towel”, but it’s still a compound either way.

            So how can we actually tell that paper towel is one word? See if the first member of the potential compound (the non-head) can be modified in any way.

            For example, we know doghouse is a compound because in “a big doghouse” big can only refer to the house, and cannot refer to “the house of a big dog”. Similarly, blackboard must be one word because it can take what appear to be contradictory modifiers: " a green blackboard".

            So, in the same way, paper towel and toilet paper are one word because “big paper towel” can’t mean “a towel made from big paper” and “pink toilet paper” can’t mean “paper for a pink toilet”. (Toilet paper also gets compound stress.)

            Yet another way to test is by semantic drift (meaning shift). As mentioned earlier, blackboards don’t have to be black, so the meaning of the compound doesn’t perfectly correspond to the pieces of the word - instead, the fact that it’s a vertical board you write on in chalk is much more important to the meaning. This is because once the pieces combine to form a new word, that new word can start to shift away from the meaning of the pieces. Again, however this process takes time, so it’s not a perfect test.

            So, back to the original question: is “factory-overclocked” one word?

            Well, it doesn’t get compound stress, and for me I can still say things like “it’s home-factory-overclocked” to mean that it was overclocked in its home factory, so the first member can take modifiers. And, the whole thing still means what the pieces mean.

            So, in my grammar, “factory-overclocked” is two words. But for some of you “home factory overclocked” may not be possible, which would indicate that it’s started to become one word for you. Everyone’s grammar is different, but we can still test for these categories.

            If you instead mean by your question, “can factory and overclocked be combined with a hyphen?”, however, I can’t help you, because language-specific writing conventions are subjective and arbitrary, and not something that linguists usually care very much about.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              And this is why I love places like Lemmy. An offhand joke turns into an actual grammar lesson. Thank you!