• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    why though? The graphics represented in the screen are already squashed and scaled, so you wouldn’t be preserving their quality in any case. If you’re worried about text, JPEG should still be able to handle it under high quality settings

    • B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We can ask the same the other way around: why do you want to use jpg if it results in a bigger size and worse quality than png?

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        But that’s patently untrue: take this 10 MB example TIFF file as an example.

        • PNG Compression, max compress (=quality 9):

          convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 9 test.png
          
        • JPG Encoding, 99% quality (=quality 99):

          convert file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff -quality 99 test.jpg
          

        Final file size comparison:

        9.7M Sep  5 13:21 file_example_TIFF_10MB.tiff
        1.7M Sep  5 13:22 test.jpg
        2.5M Sep  5 13:22 test.png
        

        PNG is significantly larger, and difference in quality between them is negligible

        • B0rax@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dude. Did you even read what I wrote? PNG is bad for photos. Your example is a photo. Go ahead and try the same with a screenshot with text and menus showing.

        • ms.lane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          png - jpg

          156K Sep  5 23:06 Screenshot_20240905_230459.jpg
          137K Sep  5 23:05 Screenshot_20240905_230459.png
          

          jpg with 80% compression, via krita.

          As B0rax said, for screenshots, png is better - it can represent line graphics and text more efficiently.