• Chewt@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m actually fairly young and wasn’t around in the 80s. I graduated college with a CS degree in the past 5 years, where I was exposed to many different tools and software. What did I come out of that experience with? I like the terminal more than any IDE I had to use in any class.

    Now in the real world, we don’t always get to use our favorite tools for every task, obviously. I do need to use other, more enterprise, software from time to time for work. But whenever possible I go to the terminal because I’m faster there, and I can quickly automate things.

    I’m not saying the terminal is the best tool for every job, I’m just saying it is the best for ME. Notice I’m also not putting down other tools here. It seems to me like you might be the one with a superiority complex.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, I’d argue you simply didn’t want to invest in the other tools.

      Think about it, you probably spent hours on customizing and automating vim, and then say you’re faster in that. Well, that’s called a habit.

      IDE are objectively more powerful and since you can actually see options and navigate quickly, you don’t need to memorize every obscure feature.

      All the terminal editor enthusiasts are actively holding us back, because they insist everything outside vim is garbage for enterprise and kiddies.

      If your tool of choice is actively hostile to new users for no reason other than “that’s how it’s always been, and thus it’s better”, well then you’re digging a moat to automate your gatekeeping.

      • Chewt@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        vim + terminal is actually objectively more powerful than any IDE, and most IDEs include a way to pull up a terminal as a crutch for things they can’t do. In any case It seems you can’t be reasoned with. Your argument is just a strawman about what you say other people are saying.