For me it’s the notification light you used to find on older phones, was particularly good to know if your phone was charged without picking it up

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but they’re all the lower end phones, all the major flagships removed the features three or four versions ago, I don’t want to have to sacrifice camera or screen quality in order to have features that should be built into phones by default

    • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m going to say that today, even on lower-end phones, the screen, processor and camera are all pretty decent.

      I have a Motorola G31, which cost about 200€ one year ago, when I got it. It has a Micro SD Card Slot and a headphone jack. The screen is plenty good (1440p,60hz) (why would you need 120hz or 4k on a phone) And the camera is also quite nice. It has no fancy features, but it takes pictures and that’s all I need.

      From my perspective, flagship phones are impractical and overpriced to say the least.

      • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ive been using 144/165hz monitors for years now and it’s jarring going back to 60 hz

        I only spent $290 Cdn after shipping and taxes for my moto g60s. I 100% agree, flagship phones are unnessesary.

      • ɠισƚԋҽϝʅσɯ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        120hz is amazing for scrolling through feeds, it is absolutely night and day. It is like turning off the annoying motion blur in a video game.

    • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then dont go for the flagship phones?

      What does a $1000 phone do that my $250 phone cant?

      Shit this POS im using can even record at 240 fps