• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly would be hard to do. There a perfectly legitimate and everyday uses for pretty much everything used in fingerprinting. Taking them away or obscuring them in one way or another would break so much.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Librewolf has Resist Fingerprinting which comes pretty far.

      Every Librewolf browser uses the same windows user agent, etc. But there are downsides, like time zones don’t work, and sites don’t use dark mode by default.

      And even then, EFF’s Cover Your Tracks site can still uniquely identify me, mainly through window size. That’s one of the reasons why Tor Browser uses letterboxing to make the window size consistent.

      • mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know what letterboxing is. But if window size is used to identify me, can’t it be circumvented simply by using the window in restored size, and not maximised?

        • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Your restored window size is even more unique than your maximised window size!

          The correct solution is to just not make the window size available to JS or to remotes at all. There’s no reason to ever need specifics on window size other than CSS media-queries, and those can be done via profiles.

          • mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            But the restored size keeps changing - can’t be profiled, right?

            And how do I not make the size available “to JS or to remote”?