• pinknoise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Yes please asses the credibility of their articles based on their associations with shady companies instead of the contents plausibility.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      You think the funding and affiliations of organisations have nothing to do with the agenda they propagate? Oh summer child.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          Snopes is not a publisher, but acting as the arbiter of truths. So if they have backing by biased entities, that leaves them vulnerable to be biased since these enitites are the stakeholders and customers, not people who might be relying on them to see facts.

          Only the customer is served by these groups. You are not a customer of Snopes or MBFC.

          • pinknoise@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            There is no independent media. This doesn’t mean that there is no value in consuming it. If some source tells you they are “unbiased”, independent from advertisers/funding or free of (private) agenda they either intentionally lie or lack self-reflection.

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 years ago

              There exists independent media. You clearly do not know your stuff and are willing to deny it as well. You have made up your mind, so this conversation is over.