It’s not just lemmy that’s benefiting from Elon Musk.

  • o0joshua0o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    He has so thoroughly ruined Twitter that you can’t help but wonder if that was his goal from the outset.

    • appel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To what end, though? The man blew 44b on a site that apparently was only worth 5-10b, and that was before he ran it into the ground. He also destroyed his reputation and the mystique as “genius entrepreneur” which the world can now clearly see he never was.

      I can’t think of a single net positive. I think it’s an age old tale with people with too much money: he fell victim to an over inflated ego and too many yes men aiming to please. He started to believe he really was brilliant.

      Sad thing is the man has so much money he still can’t fail, personally. He’ll have destroyed Twitter and even more people will lose their jobs. And autocrats around the world will be pleased. Musk will just shrug, tell himself it wasn’t his fault, “it was the libs” or something, and move on.

      Eta: the only winners here, as per usual, are the shareholders.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        44b sounds like a lot of money (it is!), but his net worth right now is 219b after this fiasco. At this point it’s just a score between rich assholes who got the bigger number.

        You could take 200b away from his evaluation and he could still retire on a yacht and not work a single day in the next 100 years. Same for his children and his children’s children.

        So yeah, “bad” financial investment, but it might be worth for him to kill one of the biggest platforms where he was called out for his bullshit.

        • kaba0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That 44b had to be paid in real cash, not just the current theoretical value of the sum of his shares. He sold quite a lot of Tesla shares afaik to banks to give them a “small loan”.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol, “real cash”, look it up what he actually did. He took a loan in the name of Twitter, so he didn’t even use his own money. Pretty much financing half of the deal with the theoretical value of the company he just bought. And he took in extra money from Saudi investors, it’s not all his money.

            There was never a 44b “real cash” transaction.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve obviously never played a board game with a narcissist. Flipping over the table and calling everyone, including the game they themselves purchased, cheaters is a totally expected move.