FYI, the repo is not DMCAd yet, only the download URL which moved to gitflic.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wish there were some quality news media where readers are willing to pay.

    All these perverted “we have a right to our revenue even though nobody wants to pay for our shitty product” assholes can go home.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem is that I don’t want to only read news from one source. I also don’t want to pay 15 different news subscriptions.

      If the same organization that shut down this repo would spend the time and money coming out with a joint account that was reasonably priced, people wouldn’t resort to piracy.

      But nope. Each paper needs their own subscribers.

      • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s like going to buy a car, getting to the car store, ahem, dealership, and finding they only have one brand of car. What the fuck is this? Let me see all the brands. It’s 2024, where’s our car stores?

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Before I start paying for it I need 1. quality news media 2. journalists are paid instead of CEOs getting millions 3. no op eds from far right radicals.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d go so far as to say no op eds at all. If I’m paying for news, I want factual, high quality, ideally unbiased news, not some chucklefuck’s opinion. I can get some chucklefuck’s opinion all over the internet for free. (Case in point: You’re getting it right now, for free, by reading this comment.)

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m on board with this. If it is newsworthy for some reason, factual reporting would be to describe what they said instead of giving a platform to say whatever. Perhaps with (legitimate, fact-based, not just “bothsidesing”) commentary on disagreeing viewpoints.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Still would not change the fact that I literally cannot afford it. But I guess being informed about what is happening in the world is not something poor people should be entitled to.

      • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know anything about your situation, and I truly don’t need details, but if you think you can’t afford access to any news outlet, I don’t think you’re trying hard enough.

        Since you’re apparently too poor to access any way to entertain or inform yourself, I’m guessing you’ve had ample time to mull over solutions to this problem, and I’m eager to learn what an ideal solution would look like from your perspective.

        Are you cool with paying for your news in exchange for your data/ads? Is there part of the editorial process we could remove to save money? Maybe we don’t need fact checkers and should just assume that journalists know what they’re talking about?

        I’m not sure how we simultaneously provide free journalism and ensure that those journalists have enough to eat themselves, but I share in your convictions that democratizing information is imperative.

        From where I sit, it seems like news organizations have moved away from showing ads for revenue to some extent, so the only option we have is to include news in our monthly budget and support journalists as much as we can.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not using a hard paywall is silly, no sympathy there. Some sympathy for when your paywalled content has been crawled for. Though not much. In this age where making copies has never been easier using force is all they can do to impose their wish of artificial scarcity.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hosting on the github was never going to work. This needs hoisting on something like a gitea behind an anonymized host which ignores dmca