Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoHealthcareslrpnk.netimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageHealthcareslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-squareMr_Blott@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·30 days agoIt’s “could have”, amigo. Never, ever “could of” Wait, unless you want to say “Could ‘of’ be the word you’re looking for?” Ok in that one case. But that needs the little quote mark thingies. So no, never, ever “could of”
minus-squareEvilCartyen@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·30 days agoMan’s helping you not look stupid and you’re calling him a troll, amigo.
minus-squareAirBreather@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·30 days agoI could of course say this as well. It’s clearer with additional punctuation like “I could, of course, […]”, but I don’t think the comma-free version is technically incorrect (anymore, if it ever was).
minus-squareMr_Blott@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·29 days agoExcellent example! I’m wracking my brains trying to think of another but I think you got the best one!
It’s “could have”, amigo. Never, ever “could of”
Wait, unless you want to say “Could ‘of’ be the word you’re looking for?”
Ok in that one case. But that needs the little quote mark thingies. So no, never, ever “could of”
Obvious troll is obvious
Man’s helping you not look stupid and you’re calling him a troll, amigo.
Congratulations, you’re dumb as fuck!
I could of course say this as well. It’s clearer with additional punctuation like “I could, of course, […]”, but I don’t think the comma-free version is technically incorrect (anymore, if it ever was).
Excellent example!
I’m wracking my brains trying to think of another but I think you got the best one!