• Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Not a film, but the series Taboo. Was crying out for it, but Tom Hardy got big after the first series.

  • shamrt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves

    Excellent, fun movie. Huge universe to built on. Shame they’re probably not continuing the series

    • RinseDrizzle@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Wait is it confirmed they’re not picking that back up? I thought that movie was pretty solid! Really felt ripe for franchising. Could either continue that party, or same actors different campaign, etc… so much potential!

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I don’t think it did well in theatres. It was also released around the time of the GPL fiasco, so lots D&D fans were still boycotting it.

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’ve never read the series but the His Dark Materials television show is really well produced. Not sure how closely it follows the books but as far as I understand it’s pretty faithfully executed.

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      The trouble with the movie was that the studio got scared out of continuing by fundamentalist Christian groups who really objected to the central premise of the books; namely that God can be killed and all life will be better off for it.

      They then fumbled the shit out of it, editing it so poorly that what they did make was a jumble of shit that no one who wasn’t familiar with the stories would care to see, and no one who loved the books would be happy with. For me it was shit like revealing Lyra’s parentage right at the beginning, rather than it being a huge surprise as in the books.

      It was a massive shame though, because the casting was damn near perfect. If they’d got Sam Elliott back to reprise the role of Lee Scorseby for the BBC adaptation, I’d have been as happy as a pig in shit. To my mind he is Lee. Lin Manuel Miranda was fine, but lacked the essential taciturn nature of the character as written. And Sir Ian McKellan as Iorek? Perfect.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      As far as I can remember the Movie did terrible, especially since it didn’t really stick to the source material

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Daemons and talking polar bears. I was sold.

        I personally am not bothered by sticking to the source material or not. Books and movies are fundamentally different.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          I’m usually fine with not everything from the book making it to the movie, but changes to the plot need to be very well reasoned for. There were for example a lot of changes to the structure of LotR when Jackson adapted it, but they didn’t change the overall plot or message, mostly just restructured it.

    • Tracked@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      What’s up with denying the trilogy? The shitty PC era movie I get it. But the sequels were excellent, the symbolism and how smith is defeated it’s brilliant. I bet you wanted a copy of the first movie.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        You call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one

        I call it trilogy because I reject the first one

        We are not the same

        Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It became a parody of Godzilla movies for no real reason. And it came out of nowhere. I call it the movies 4th act.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Jurassic World is a guilty pleasure of mine.
        It’s good enough to grip you and at the same time so predictable and full of clichés it’s also funny.
        Plus, Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are both hot as hell.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          …uhhhhhhh, I would ask your mom if she smoked while pregnant with you. There’s clearly something wrong with the development of how your brain came out.

          • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Look, I’m not saying any of them come close to the original, but imo it’s the second best of the series (including all the dogshit jurassic worlds) because it sticks to what made the first one great; small amount of people trapped on an island with dinos. The Lost World was like half that but then it turns in to some weird almost king kong-esq thing. Also i love me some Goldblum but he’s better as a foil imo and Chris Pratt has nowhere near the gravitas as Sam Neil. Like really besides the annoying parents what do you not like about the third one?

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I got around to watching it a few years ago, and holy shit is it ever better than everyone says it is. It’s SO FAR ahead of its time—it feels like an early-to-mid 2010’s Adult Swim movie. Ebert can fuck right off, it’s a comedic MASTAPIECE.

      I never saw it back in the days where it was sooooo critically panned. It seems to have aged swimmingly.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Wow. I caught it on a channel recently and watched the first 20 minutes and had to turn it off. That style of humor is so outdated imo. Tom Green’s comedy is just being awkward and repeating the same thing(s) over and over.

        I’m glad you still enjoyed it though. I know it’s highly regarded as a cult classic. I just couldn’t stand it myself. I’m in my 40s btw, so I grew up during the Tom Green era of popularity.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I’m a bit younger, in my 30s. I also enjoyed the Tom Green show growing up. I think I might be biased because I love his antics and I was tripping acid when I saw it.

  • 7uWqKj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Return of the Jedi. Episode 7 is not a sequel but a remake. Episodes 8 and 9 are bullshit.

    • Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I mean, if we’re talking release order, then Return of the Jedi did get a sequel! It was called The Phantom Menace and ahh

      Ahahaha hahahahahahahaha. I’m sorry, I’m sorry! I almost made it through with a straight face.