• ben_dover@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        it’s the only one i knew about before the other comment. with more browsers using it, we may not need to build another engine from scratch to broaden competition

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think this is the argument that the Ladybird people have made:

          • Chrome is dependent on Google ( obviously )
          • Edge is dependent on Google ( based on Chromium )
          • Firefox is dependent on Google ( 80% of revenue )
          • Safari is dependent on Google ( $4 billion from Google )
          • most other browsers are dependent on Google ( use Chromium ) - Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, etc

          Ladybird is intended to be a truly independent browser and especially independent of Google.

          • Leaflet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Safari isn’t dependent on Google. It was just a no-brainer for Apple to take a free 20 billion dollars from Google for setting the default search engine to something most users would want anyway.