After using LineageOS for long time, I have finally moved to GrapheneOS. I use a lot of banking and financial apps which I never felt comfortable using on LineageOS due to lack of proper sandboxing, unlocked bootloader etc.

GrapheneOS works flawlessly just like Android. You don’t even notice there’s hardening underneath. Also it protects from Google’s evil location tracking using WiFi/Bluetooth or even when the Location is turned off. I don’t understand how people in general are comfortable with Google tracking all the time. You can use Google Play and Play Services in a sandbox that works just like regular installation, but without deep tracking.

If you haven’t tried GrapheneOS, try it. You won’t go back to regular Android.

      • Einar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Doesn’t change that this only runs on Pixel devices. I simply don’t want a Pixel device for various reasons. Used or not, Graphene won’t run officially on a Sony, a Fairphone, etc.

        • Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If the security benefits of a pixel is less important then the fact Google made it then GOS is simply not meant for you.

          Its silly people complain about it being only compatible for pixels but never seem to blame other android brands for making significantly less secure phones. The responsibility should be put on phone makers to create secure phones that meet GOS requirements, not to expect GOS to make a less secure OS.

          The whole AOSP environment is very Google centric so its pretty weird to think because your not buying a pixel that you are somehow avoiding Google.

          • Einar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have more considerations than security, like a headphone jack and other details. But you have my upvote anyways, because you make a lot of sense. I agree with you. 🏅

            • Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              That’s fair, and the reasons why someone buys a phone is a personal choice.

              I would suggest with things like a headphone jack that, while its annoying to buy an adapter (usb-c to headphone) it may be worth the cost vs sacrificing something like hardware security.

              Sadly a lot of the time consumers are forced to choose between security and privacy or convenience.

            • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I do agree that the lack of a headphone jack absolutely kills me. It’s a reason I haven’t pulled the trigger either way on a new phone yet. On the one hand, I want a secure degoogled phone that maintains a lot of functionality with GOS. On the other, I want a modern phone with a headphone jack a la Sony. I go back and forth constantly.

      • curry@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My country’s second hand market sucks donkey balls. Import fees are crazy if you even dare to use Amazon instead of cheap Chinese shop. I just wanna scream.

        • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It is possible to replace them, with a little research. Or just taking them to a phone repair shop if you’re too anxious for that

    • exploder@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, it’s kind of wild and ironic that one of the most private OSes requires a Google phone.

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Not only that but it relies on the Pixel’s black box “Titan” security chip, that google pinky-promised to open source but never did…

        • aa1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Titan security chip is not a black box. The Titan M1 gas been scrutinazed by blackhat: https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3503921.3503922

          Just because something is not open source does not mean you can’t verify it (no, i’m not shilling closed slurce; no i don’t think closed > open; no i don’t think closed source is more secure)

          • refalo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That work was not available when GrapheneOS was developed, and is not necessarily applicable to devices released after those findings… I still consider it a black box.

            • aa1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              That work was not available when GrapheneOS was developed

              What do you mean ? This has nothing to do with GrapheneOS in the first place (which by the way has been created in 2014. The article i linked refers to 2021).

              I still consider it a black box.

              Reverse engineering is a thing. It always has been. If every piece of closed source was a blackbox how can you explain exploitation ? How can bad actors exploit Windows, MacOS, CPU firmware and so on ? Your argument here is not practical. Also, why should Google put a backdoor inside a chip ? They already get every information they what directly from the people agreeing to use their software. So, why bother ? Moreover, every phone on the market has closed source firmware.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Buy a Pixel second hand. Then you’re just reimbursing someone who already made that mistake. ;)

      • radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just research ahead and don’t buy one with a known hardware defect such as the 5As which are notorious for frying motherboards and screens. Went through 5 of them with the extended warranty over my phones life and they all died while in my hand abruptly. Less than a year or life per device almost always failing around 8 months for me.

        If grapheneOS wasn’t so damn good I would’ve left pixels after that, Pixel XL abruptly died, 2XL had both cameras and the fingerprint sensor die out of nowhere, then the 4 5As. On an 8a right now and love it so fingers crossed it lasts!

        If they had a user repairable device that ran it I’d buy it in a heartbeat

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been running it a couple of months now. All my banking apps work but 1 and I use one of my other phones for that.

    • PullPantsUnsworn@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      GrapheneOS is the easy to install OS among any mobile platform. Everything is through a web UI, so you are very unlikely to brick your phone. You don’t need to type a single command. Also even if you brick a Pixel phone, it’s very easy to install stock Android build through Google with a similar installation process.

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I couldn’t tell you. The page / list was made for graphene and I don’t know the technical differences between running that and lineage + micro g so not sure if the same list could apply. Sorry.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is stupid helpful, thank you. I wouldn’t have thought to look this up on my own but now that I know it I’m a good bit more likely to try Graphene on my next phone. This is way more apps than I would have guessed.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My bank apps all work fine. Just keep your physical bank cards on you because Google Wallet won’t work with credit cards, NFC or transport passes. Your gig tickets and membership cards will load fine though.

      You probably don’t want Google rummaging through your purchase history anyway. I certainly don’t miss it.

    • Salix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I personally have to toggle on Exploit protection compatibility mode in App info to get some of my banking apps to work

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t mind giving graphene a try but I’ll be honest, I have the following issues:

    • Need to buy a pixel phone for this.
    • I use a memory card so pixel phones might not be an option.
    • fear of bricking a phone that I just got.
      • Fake4000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can but the issue is that I won’t be using it. My current phone will be better than a used phone bought.

    • It’s impossible to brick a Pixel while flashing GrapheneOS, thanks to their super easy to use Web-based installer, and Google’s great support for alternative operating systems, which also makes the installation process easier and safer.
      If you mess anything up, you can always restart from the beginning and get it fixed. You can’t break a Pixel during flashing.

  • PierreKanazawa@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Great!

    I go back to regular degoogled Android btw. Not a fan of the new pixel design. May come back later

  • 0oWow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wish there was a way to keep Grapheneos installed and locked down without root, but with a way to adjust screen color. The only way I can tolerate pixel screen color reproduction is to root it and use an app to adjust it.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s also CalyxOS if you don’t want to run anything Google on your phone at all, but still have functional apps and such.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, Graphene does that too, by default. It just has the app store available to be installed in their apps updater. If you don’t go there to install it by yourself, it’s a Google-less device by default.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Functional apps is the important bit, use of microG allows apps to provide push messaging etc without knowing Google services aren’t installed. There’s still some communication with Google as a result, but it’s fully sanitized.

        I invite you to try installing common apps like Strava or Pokemon go without any Google services at all.

        • NullGator@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I was under the impression you could use microG instead of google services as well if you installed it manually?

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Graphene uses the same sandboxing as AOSP. If you are talking about Google services framework then that makes a little sense but by itself the apps are about the same in terms of security.

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People contemplating moving to graphene, do be aware that banking etc. absolutely can be a major PITA on graphene as well. Several official apps used where i live cannot work in graphene, even with sandboxed play services installed, making day-to-day life functionally impossible with graphene. Luckily reverting to stock android is easy, although I probably wouldn’t have bought a pixel phone if I was planning on using stock OS.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t it only Google Wallet that doesn’t work? I actually cancelled a bank account I had because their app only worked with Google Wallet. Some banks roll their own NFC payment thing.

      I’m on CalyxOS btw, not Graphene.

      • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Some banking apps won’t run without SafetyNet (technically now Play Integrity). Pure AOSP doesn’t have it, and AOSP distributions with sandboxed play services or whatever usually fail the hardware attestation requirements. There are some other reasons banking apps won’t work, but a lot of it is similar stuff.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No that doesn’t work either, but we use a 2FA app to enable mobile banking access, SS access, school communications/message board etc., basically anything that requires you to prove your identity. That app doesn’t work in graphene at all, it flat out refuses and states the OS isn’t secure or the app isn’t installed from a valid source, so all things dependant on this doesn’t work on graphene.

    • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Making day to day life functionally impossible” is a bit drastic. I think that depends on each individual person, their needs both in terms of banking and privacy.

      My banking app doesn’t work on Graphene but I also couldn’t care less. I can just as easily log in to my account via my browser on my phone if I need to do something and it isn’t exactly hard, it takes all of 30 seconds more than using an app.

      I realise in some other countries you don’t have that option but were I in the same situation for me that would be enough to change banks, I don’t want to be forced to use an app for anything.

      Everyone has different lengths they are willing to go to to protect their privacy and I’m willing to make my life slightly harder where as others may not but I think saying it makes life functionally impossible is a bit of an overstatement and it needs to be judged based on individual needs.

      There is a list of what banking apps work and what don’t.I’ll post it in a top level comment for visibility.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The thing is, I’d need the government 2FA app (which doesn’t work in graphene) when logging in to my bank on a browser as well, so that doesn’t change anything.

        And I can’t do anything, I can’t check my digital mailbox (not email, we have something specifically for official communication with bank, government etc.), I can’t log in to check messages from my kids school, I can’t order a doctors appointment…you get the picture.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            it’s a problem because graphene os doesn’t pass google play safety check, or whatever it is called. They are apparently not able to make the sandboxes play services good enough to pass so the app accepts it’s validity.

            • unrushed233@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s actually a problem with Google, because the only reason GrapheneOS doesn’t pass the Play Integrity API check is that Google enforces a whitelist of allowed operating systems. Even though GrapheneOS is 10x as secure as the stock OS, Google doesn’t allow it. Since this is a highly monopolistic practice, the GrapheneOS team is talking to regulators to finally stop this: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/112916691727814901

        • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah i understand what you are saying and that is why everyone’s individual needs come into play.

          I don’t know what country you are in and that can obviously affect things, my banks 2FA is an SMS. I have options in terms of the other things you mentioned, where as you may not have.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Well, I never really missed being able to pay via NFC on a phone, but I also never done it. My NFC chip in my card works fine.

      When my baking app started detecting my rooted phone, I just switched to using their web-app via Firefox, which allows you to create a direct link to it as an “App”. Which is probably better anyway, than installing random proprietary apps on a phone. And logging into it every time is also easy with a password manager.

      So I guess, as long as the banks still offer a website, I am good.

  • ivn@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My next phone is definitely going to be a Pixel for this reason. But my current one is not even 6 years old so I’ll wait a bit.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just looked it up and GrapheneOS only works on google hardware? So you had to give google some money first or did you get it to work on something else?

    • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah the fact that Pixel Phones are the defacto standard for privacy phones is absurd. It’s guaranteed chock full of hardware surveillance tools you can’t remove with custom roms or kernels.

      Outside of the Pixel lineup, custom rom support is almost non-existant in 2024. it’s wild, you can get the same or better hardware for half the price.

      • Persen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Xiaomis and some other chinease brands have decent custom rom support, but no grapheneos and no bootloader relocking (except some oneplus phones)

        • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have a Xiaomi, I love their hardware and the fact that it’s bugged by a foreign nation rather than my own. But Xiaomi software is garbage and flashing is an absolute pain. I looked at what rom support modern Xiaomi devices have and I am not impressed. It’s almost all half baked or not privacy oriented. I’ve been struggling with one of said ROMs for years.

          I am sick of flashing one-off ROMs without proper support or OTA, and constant system level bugs.

          I’d love to have a manufacturer with open-source/open hardware focused cheap high performance repairable hardware and with privacy ROMs as a first-class citizen. Like a Fairphone if it was good.

          But sadly all of these devices end up with bad support too in the end.

          I think the main issue is that most ROM developers today only buy the most high end flagship devices, since those are the only ones that get any decent support. I’m guessing that’s because they all got high paying tech jobs now.

          • Persen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well, there is no support from privacy roms, but I can survive with lineageos+microg (with somewhat decent updates) on redmi 4x. There is support for poco f5 and redmi 12 from crdroid, which supports microg and is apparently decent.

    • Recant@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you buy one used that is how you can get around giving Google money.

      From a security standpoint it might give you a temporary benefit since all of Google’s tracking IDs will be associated with the original owner. On a new phone I figure it’s associated with you immediately.

      • Undertaker@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not really. You carry arround a Google devices and people notice the brand and devices are more valuable when also desired second hand.

        All of this supports Google

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Cover the G logo with a pop socket or some shit. No one will give enough of a shit to desire your phone. Buying used always denies OEMs sales so its always good to buy used

  • Bappity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    honestly the only thing that is stopping me moving rn is Google Pay contactless for my bank cards and my bank app having ridiculous requirements with safetycheck.

    • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Definitely go ahead and tell your bank that you are annoyed by their mobile app only working on the stock OS. Call them, send them an email, whatever. If enough people complain or even threaten to switch banks over this, they might add better support using actual secure hardware-based attestation, which also works on GrapheneOS.

      I even switched banks because of their ridiculous requirements for the mobile app, just so I could continue using GrapheneOS. I know that Graphene is much more secure than any other Android-based OS, and running my banking app on it is much safer than on another device. Banks should finally realize this too, which is why we need to complain.