That’s, what, 7% less…

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Excuse the dumb question, but what kind of ounce are we talking about?

    There’s apparently an “imperial fluid ounce”, which is 28.4130625 mL.
    There’s a “US customary fluid ounce”, which is 29.5735295625 mL and certainly sounds like it might be customary in the US.
    But then there’s also the “US food labeling fluid ounce”, which is exactly 30 mL, and I guess, would be even more customary in US food labeling, but if it’s an even mL number, then I’m confused how we end up with such a crooked number as 404.

    Or is it just that there’s some regulation which says a pub-pint-sized can must be 14 oz, but for some reason, you’re allowed to be half an ounce below that (404 / 30 mL = 13.466)…?

    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_ounce

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s not a dumb question, but you’re presuming standards and exactness that do not exist in practice.

      A pub pint is a pint glass that is deceptively smaller than a full pint, usually about 14oz. That’s all it is. This can is the same as a pub pint – both in spirit and practice – as far as I can tell.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I am German, so we definitely take measuring (and beer) a bit too serious.

        When I was younger, I learned that there was a tolerated margin of error, something like the package may say 200 mL, but it actually only contains 195 mL at times.
        This absolutely makes sense in retrospect, but at the time, I was genuinely surprised that this was not something we measured at mL precision. They need to provide that whole ingredients list and nutrition table, so just measuring how much is in the package felt like the easy part.