Obviously a hypothetical scenario. There is no way to pass on the knowledge to anyone else. Time freezes for you only, and once you have your answer you are out of this world.

The question can allow you to see into the past, present and future and gain comprehension of any topic/issue. But it’s only one question.

What would you want to know? Personally I’d want to see a timelapse or milestone glimpses of humanity’s future until the end of Earth’s existence (if we survive that long)

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t want to ruin your idea, I think it’s kinda neat. But I think that you may be monkey pawing yourself.

    A tremendous amount people have suffered so much, that I’d probably not want the experience in its current form. The horrors of the holocaust, unit 731, and a lot of wars springs to mind, from just the last century.

    IDK how you could modify the question, but “no violent deaths” could be a starting point.

    • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think there is a short clear way to avoid potential centuries of suffering. Living in pain could be worse than a violent death.

      Imagine a life time as a comatose patient who is still conscious and can hear but not respond?

      Years of nearly starving to death. Years of physical abuse? Slowly dying in a hospital from cancer / some other slow painful death.

      Hiker trapped alone on a mountain.

      In short no thanks.

      • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly, those are all selling points. I’d love to understand how a coma patient thinks a few months in, a few years in and a few decades in. What it’s like to die in war in the year, 700, 1700 & 2700. To die as a newborn and then eventually see how those very parents are affected. So long as it is randomized and I’m statistically likely to see something radically different tommorow, I don’t think I’ll ever get sick of the human experince.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’d modify the question to specify that each life is presented as a unique and compelling motion picture, each between an hour and four hours in length, of the sort that would be likely to win either critical acclaim or box office success (or both) at some point in the late 20th to early 21st century - and that I get to watch them in an unending variety of well-staffed and enthusiastically-attended movie theaters, with interesting companions who I can discuss the movie with for as long as I want to afterwards, with endless credit to spend at the concessions, and with no bodily needs like discomfort or fatigue.