The company suspects that the problem is due to a ‘database infrastructure related change’ that it is trying to roll back.

  • rhabarba@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ubiquity is not always the most relevant decision. (Especially as most VCS which aren’t Git :-) are easy enough to understand - most of them are even easier than Git in my opinion.)

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Of course it’s not the only factor, but all things being equal, the most prevalent tool should be preferred.

      • rhabarba@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It depends on the outer circumstances, I think. Using the prevalent tool makes sense in existing environments (which is one of the reasons why many companies use SVN - it worked for them before Git existed and it still works for them, so why not?). For new projects, one-man teams and/or companies starting from scratch, Git might not always be the best choice.