In my country, two states (Kerala and Karnataka) sued each other to get exclusive rights over an acronym. They spent 7 years engaged in a legal battle and eventually they went back to square one with the courts permitting both states to use the acronym.

Both of them probably spent millions on the case just to get nothing. They are both states in the same country so why are they allowed to sue other for bs reasons? What a waste of tax payer money.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s bizarre to talk about XX century events as “a century ago”, but accurate in this case: 1912-16.