• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Your understanding of fptp and the US district voting system is correct, but I’m still not sure how any different voting system solves dividing districts into specific voting blocks.

    I guess it would make a small but significant difference over time, but as long as gerrymandering is legal within the US framework, it’s still very easy to manipulate the results by district, ranked choice voting or not.

    It’s s kind of like the structural problem of the electoral college. You can change the rules within the electoral college, but as long as you have those 200 people standing between the popular vote and the presidency, Donald Trump can get elected despite people not wanting him to be president.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Without FPTP, you would simply count the votes, and send the data to the election agency who will compile the final result.

      There is no selecting a winner for each district and sending that on, mening there is no point to gerrymandering as it would not affect the result.

      The electoral collage should also be scrapped, there is zero point to it.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh, for sure.

        Any voting system within the current US structure won’t be affected that much by switching voting formats, but illegalizing gerrymandering will make a huge difference in their current structure.

        For ranked-choice voting to have a big impact, the US would have to change its whole voting system first.

        Which I agree, they should.