I’ve just been playing around with https://browserleaks.com/fonts . It seems no web browser provides adequate protection for this method of fingerprinting – in both brave and librewolf the tool detects rather unique fonts that I have installed on my system, such as “IBM Plex” and “UD Digi Kyokasho” – almost certainly a unique fingerprint. Tor browser does slightly better as it does not divulge these “weird” fonts. However, it still reveals that the google Noto fonts are installed, which is by far not universal – on a different machine, where no Noto fonts are installed, the tool does not report them.

For extra context: I’ve tested under Linux with native tor browser and flatpak’d Brave and Librewolf.

What can we do to protect ourselves from this method of fingerprinting? And why are all of these privacy-focused browsers vulnerable to it? Is work being done to mitigate this?

    • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
      0·
      4 months ago

      It should, but I guess this user disabled it. I visited the same site with javascript disabled (not in tor browser, I don’t trust it (css, huge mozilla codebase), I use w3m with torsocks and my useragent set to tor browsers) and it can’t fingerprint.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlEnglish
      0·
      4 months ago

      Tor has noscript automatically enabled no?

      There’s three security settings via NoScript in Tor browser. The default has JS enabled.