ksp [il/lui]@jlai.lu to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoZed on Linux is out!zed.devexternal-linkmessage-square197fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.org
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkZed on Linux is out!zed.devksp [il/lui]@jlai.lu to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square197fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.org
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoimagine the nightmare of writing a 65 bit instruction set
minus-squarelaughterlaughter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI don’t think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch. Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit “bytes” (fyves?) Hoozah! Done.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoonly if double precision can be called high fyves
minus-squarelaughterlaughter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThis is a mandatory rule now.
minus-squarebitcrafter@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoHave you really not heard of it? It is a new architecture that is a bit better than x64_64.
ooh, available for “x86_65” on Alpine
x86_64++
Plus ultra!
imagine the nightmare of writing a 65 bit instruction set
I don’t think it has to be a nightmare per se if you start from scratch.
Instead of 8-bit bytes, you have 5-bit “bytes” (fyves?) Hoozah! Done.
only if double precision can be called high fyves
This is a mandatory rule now.
Have you really not heard of it? It is a new architecture that is a bit better than x64_64.
Finally. 65 bit processor.