On P2P payments from their FAQ: “While the payment appears to be directly between wallets, technically the operation is intermediated by the payment service provider which will typically be legally required to identify the recipient of the funds before allowing the transaction to complete.

How about, no? How about me paying €50 to a guy for fixing my bike doesn’t need to be intermediated and KYCed? How about it’s none of the government’s business how I split the bill at dinner with friends? This level of surveillance is madness, especially coming from an app that touts “privacy” as a feature.

  • datendefekt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know how the technical implementation will work, but here is a post I found.

    The idea is that you transfer money from the bank to your device, just like withdrawing cash from an ATM. Transferring money from one wallet to another should be able to be offline.

    It seems like privacy is a priority, if only to satisfy privacy groups and improve acceptance.

    • Username@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You still need to be able to defend against double spends, meaning I digitally copy my wallet and give two people the same 5€.