On P2P payments from their FAQ: “While the payment appears to be directly between wallets, technically the operation is intermediated by the payment service provider which will typically be legally required to identify the recipient of the funds before allowing the transaction to complete.

How about, no? How about me paying €50 to a guy for fixing my bike doesn’t need to be intermediated and KYCed? How about it’s none of the government’s business how I split the bill at dinner with friends? This level of surveillance is madness, especially coming from an app that touts “privacy” as a feature.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not any closer than already existing commercial cashless payment solutions (which are much, much worse for privacy).

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is totally unrelated to GNU Taler though, and if it comes to that you will be happy to have GNU Taler as an privacy preserving option.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The person accepting the money needs online access, or at least some sort of way to receive a validation code. As for the buyer, I think currently there is no implementation of it, but according to my understanding of it it would be technically possible to load Taler tokens on a card chip and use them from that.