OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前So much for Blockchain's real life use caseslemmy.mlimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageSo much for Blockchain's real life use caseslemmy.mlOneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square125fedilink
minus-square_MusicJunkie@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 年前For each project there is one authoritative instance, one “server” that everyone pushes to. Otherwise you get chaos.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 年前Otherwise you get git. You’re describing svn.
minus-squareperishthethought@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 年前That may be how you use it, but that’s not baked into git. See my previous response. There’s a bunch of FUD in this thread for some reason.
minus-squareThann@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 年前People want simple answers, and “blockchain bad” seems to satisfy many
minus-squareAsyx@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 年前That’s not a git thing though. You can totally have multiple remotes and the remotes are just git repositories themselves. Git is 100% decentralized. There is technically nothing stopping you from having multiple remotes.
minus-squareThann@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 年前And nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.
minus-square_MusicJunkie@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 年前If you want to work with the original project, you have to push to the server that controls the original project.
minus-squareThann@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 年前No you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone
For each project there is one authoritative instance, one “server” that everyone pushes to. Otherwise you get chaos.
Otherwise you get git. You’re describing svn.
That may be how you use it, but that’s not baked into git. See my previous response. There’s a bunch of FUD in this thread for some reason.
People want simple answers, and “blockchain bad” seems to satisfy many
That’s not a git thing though. You can totally have multiple remotes and the remotes are just git repositories themselves. Git is 100% decentralized. There is technically nothing stopping you from having multiple remotes.
And nobody ever forked a project, and lived happily ever after, then end.
If you want to work with the original project, you have to push to the server that controls the original project.
No you don’t, you can just fork it, add a commit, and walk away, and everyone can decide which one they want to clone