300 million lbs of fireworks and 2.7 billion dollars gone in a cloud of smoke.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Several other people feel this way and you’re all wrong. Is good food wasted because after you eat it it’s gone? Are vacations stupid because once it’s over nothing has materially changed? No? So why are fireworks pointless simply because they’re temporary?

    • WeebLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The major difference between fireworks and those other examples, is that fireworks directly affect others around you. In my city, people go out and buy the big fireworks that are illegal here because they go into the sky and make lots of sparks and they shoot them off in the city. Fireworks majorly affect all the animals in a pretty wide radius. Which is why I hate them, because the people have no respect for how much they are traumatizing the animals or how much they are affecting their neighbors. And don’t forget they are a fire hazard.

      This becomes more of an argument about peoples’ irresponsible use of fireworks rather just the use of fireworks at this point.

  • ArgyBargy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not only that, but they seriously freak me (and like a bunch of animals) out. Not to mention everytime they go off, even on 'murica day, someone thinks it’s a gun. At least where Ive lived.

  • Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yup, that could also be said about music, cinema and any other form of art/entertainment/distraction. It doesn’t produce anything “useful”, but again, what is “useful” varies from one person to another. Some would say the waste of money is the point. You blow fireworks because you can.

    Ultimately nothing matters because there is no true meaning of life, so anything that pulls you away from the dark nothingness of existence is good to take.

    • rodbiren@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t think of other art forms that blow off the hands of so many people, wake up my daughter in terror at 11PM, and make both dogs and veterans suffer for an extended period of time. I’m fine with the large group spectacle that is planned and controlled. What I can’t stand is the widespread uncontrollable nonsense of just anyone buying them and setting them off at any hour on the 4th. Law enforcement can do absolutely nothing about it. I’m just gonna have to deal with it. I’m just surprised we haven’t collectively shifted to something less harmful.

      • illi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not just dogs or other pets, but also farm and wild animals. And it may not only lead to suffering, but also lead to their deaths.

          • illi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep. With wild animals it may result in the running away in fear without thought and get lost or injured which may result in their death. This technically applies to all animals.

            Another aspect which affects all is heart attack from the shock.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess ban vehicles of any sort, then. I’d imagine animals dying from fireworks are nearly 0. I’d imagine ones dead from traveling are a thousand an hour in the US.

              • illi@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Great whataboutism. I assume you mean roadkill? That makes one relatively small chance of directly affecting (not necessarily killing) one animal in wider area. One firework has pretty much guaranteed chance of affecting all animals in wide area.

                The utility of the firework is also zero compared to a vehicle. In a vehicle you have a chancenof affecting the outcome of potential collision. You can drive more safely when the chance of encountering animals is higher.

                And about the nearly 0 chance of death - I don’tbhave statistics but have some examples of pets dying due to shock. There was this village where fireworks got banned because every year a couple of horses died on New Years. A couple of years back there was really eye opening picture (I think from Rome) where a whole square was littered by dead pigeons morning after New Years.

                And less not forgey the stress and suffering caused to countless others that don’t die. Discounting them is like saying tortuting is ok because people usually survive it.

                And if you don’t care about animals, think about the PTSD of war veterans or other people living through war. Plus the polution and smoke is not good for the health, not mentioning the lost fingers that strain health care for that day.

                Is a few pretty explosions really worth others suffering (especially when there are now ways to have light shows without or with considerably less negative effects)?

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s what I’m saying. One day we’ll look back in amazement that we let the public buy fireworks willy-nilly. Even the “it was good enough for me!” crowd of angry old-timers will have to go “Well, yeah, people blowed they hands off. And it bothered my vet’ren son and the neighbor’s dogs somethin fierce. They’re alright. It’s prolly fer the best.”

        Now, I fully admit later today I will be running around in a country field with my friends shooting bottle rockets at each other. But we won’t be bothering SOMEONE ELSE, and that’s my thing.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          One day we’ll look back in amazement that we let people have sex willy nilly and bond with whomever they like on a whim, forming friendships and families without central oversight.

          But that doesn’t mean that future we’ll be looking back from in amazement won’t be a dystopian nightmare, or that our perspective won’t be warped by even more decades of infantilization.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          As someone who generally is in favor of regulating dangerous things, fireworks are fine as-is. They’re basically limited to one night a year, the damage is not very extreme, and the people getting hurt are by and large the people choosing to endanger themselves.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except fireworks has literally been a part of civilization for 1,000 plus years, so I don’t see that changing anytime soon.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I can’t stand is the widespread uncontrollable nonsense of just anyone buying them and setting them off at any hour on the 4th. Law enforcement can do absolutely nothing about it.

        Do you understand why this is our way of celebrating Independence Day? Fireworks are a loud, visible, symbol and example of freedom from authority.

        • rodbiren@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          We also have the freedom to self govern. Laws are on the books to prevent firework usage in my state, it is simply ignored one night a year because it turns out mass lawbreaking is hard to handle. I don’t have the right to conduct a parade in the middle of whichever street I want whenever I want. I participate in the social contract of sacrificing absolute freedom for mutual gain because I live in a country and am not a sovereign citizen claiming complete supremacy over all others. My taxes pay for a small and well moderated fireworks show at a designated location conducted by a local government for which I had a hand in voting for. My freedom is louder, collective, voted for, and more sensible. Not all freedom must be focused soley on the individual.

      • Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You make a good point. Which can also be made about any form of freedom as soon as it encroaches on someone else’s comfort.

        Ignoring the obvious nuance, a loud concert or a horror movie are also not something law enforcement will do anything against but it could terrorize people as well.

        • Odigo2020@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If a loud concert or horror movie popped up next door and rattled the houses of an entire neighborhood from 10pm to 2am, I’m pretty sure law enforcement would do something about it.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            it would bother you that much even only being once a year? really?

            that’s wild

            • Odigo2020@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If only it were once a year. This year, people started on the 28th of fucking June, and didn’t stop until the goddamn 6th.

              If it actually was contained to the 4th, I would be fine with it, but getting woken up by an explosion every night at 1:30am for a week straight, it gets real old, real fast.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but none of them are anywhere near as ephemeral as a firework display.

      • Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t make them more/less worth it.

        If your criteria for worthiness is persistence then is a nice looking meal as worth it as equally nutritious goop ?

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Something like a sunset, a blizzard, or a thunderstorm are the more closely comparable natural equivalent. They’re special because they’re short-lived or rare.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A theater performance is equally ephemeral. Or a concert. Or meeting your favorite celebrity. Or a good meal.

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course they are a waste of money, and the plastic packaging is incredibly bad for the environment. And they are fun and I will buy them again next year.

  • souperk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They also scare the crap out of my dog, and cause a lot of accidents. Though, they can be beautiful…

  • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think they’re amazing. The chemistry of colored flame has fascinated me since I was young, and there’s nothing quite like being close to explosions. If I had more time and lived in the US I’d be a hobby pyrotechnician.

  • Novamdomum@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fireworks are a funny one because you’re completely right and also not completely right I think. It’s one of those unresolvable dichotomies of life where two opposing ideas are both true at the same time. I’ve often thought fireworks were the most obvious way to set fire to a lot of money that could be better used somewhere else. However, what is also true is that humans have a deep need to celebrate and to come together in large groups and have shared experiences. Fireworks are perfect for that. You can put a million people together and launch a massive firework display and they will all immediately connect with each other through the shared experience of going “Oooooohh” and “Aaaaaaahh” :) Fireworks are awesome and also, personally I feel they remind me that there are bigger things out there than the daily grind of existence.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      humans have a deep need to celebrate and to come together in large groups and have shared experiences

      Isn’t that what parades are for?

      personally I feel they remind me that there are bigger things out there than the daily grind of existence

      There are other ways to get that. The universe is huge, look up on a quiet night with little light pollution.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that what parades are for?

        But parades are boring

        There are other ways to get that. The universe is huge, look up on a quiet night with little light pollution.

        People need novelty in life, if it’s there every day it’s not special.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair, I just think there are ways to get that besides blowing things up once a year, especially given that fireworks produce a lot of unnecessary waste and pollution in the environment.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I just think there are ways to get that besides blowing things up once a year

            I mean, I think it’s good that people get to safely experience explosions, something most people probably wouldn’t experience in their lives otherwise.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that what parades are for?

        Kinda. Parades are also for showing off nuclear warheads and how precisely your soldiers can march.

        Fireworks are a more non centralized version of it. Everyone can participate in the fireworks, not just stand there and watch.

        Also they burst in air, giving them better visibility than something that just flows down the street in front of you.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everyone can participate in the fireworks, not just stand there and watch.

          Don’t we just stand there when we watch fireworks too 🤣

    • thisfro@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fair enough, but why does every single person need their own firework? That connection is conpletely lost then

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I obviously can’t speak for everyone, but whenever we do fireworks on the 4th or New Year’s, it’s with a group of a solid 15-30 people. I don’t think we’d ever set off fireworks by ourselves

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every single person needs the opportunity to get their own firework and contribute. We’ve never had a rule like “everyone needs their own firework”.

        Everyone needs the option. That is important. It’s not important that everyone takes it, but it’s important everyone is given the option.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just don’t get it. It terrifies people’s pets, and the wildlife outside, it’s incredibly noisy (meaning you can’t get away from it if you live near someone doing it), and it produces tons of waste and pollution. Can’t we just have a big BBQ like we do the rest of the year when we celebrate stuff?

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They seem very backwards when there are drone displays and other forms of entertainment. Humans cling on to things way too long.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In many fireworks displays such as the London new year ones there are drone displays incorporated.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And you’re in your 60s or something, wise with age and experience? You’ve at least got half a century under your belt I hope, to criticize the concept of traditions generally?

    • ChexMax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a big part of it is that they’re dangerous. It’s fun to experience just a tinge of fear from how big they sound, or even just from being near the little street versions. It’s a (relatively) safe way for us to experience something that would otherwise be terror inducing explosives.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, safe aside from all the accidents that happen every year. Like kids blowing off fingers or what have you. I mean I get it, but having any random Joe be able to buy a ton of explosives then go home, drink, and play with them seems needlessly risky. Especially in dry areas where fires can start or around large groups of people.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s a false equivalency.

            They are explosives. They are less safe than most sports, movies, video games, concerts, tons of things. This is like saying “yes, doing knife throwing tricks at people is less safe than pillows”. Of course it is, what bar are you setting. Come on, fireworks are literally playing with explosives. Children and drunk people alike.

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                And way less safe than not playing with explosives at all.

                You gain brief enjoyment at the risk of fires and injuries. This makes no sense.

                • ChexMax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s almost like our collective experience is so boring and gloomy and so stressful for our little bodies and brains that we as a species are prone to mercurial outbursts where we act recklessly as a way to prove our existence to ourselves

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For pollution, at least CO2, 300M lb is 136k metric tons. I didn’t know the water to CO2 ratio for solid rocket motors, but I’d guess maybe half is CO2. Cars produce 1.5B tons of CO2 per year in the US, so the CO2 would be about equivalent to about 24 min of driving cars. That doesn’t seem too unreasonable.

    But maybe you were taking about the metals? I don’t know how much of an issue those are.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately this isn’t complete combustion. There’s a shit ton of PM and everything else. Ever go to a big show? They have to take pauses for the smoke to clear so that you can see the next batch.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not worse, it’s different. CO2 kills everything on earth but that takes a lot of it. The toxins you listed can give a community long term health issues without that much exposure. It’s a local problem vs a global problem.

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Everything is unnecessary. We could just off ourselves and there’d be no more pollution. The only reason our existence matter is the way we feel about it. Which is the same reason fireworks matter.

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That depends on a lot more factors for how dilute it gets. I didn’t know how likely it is for the air currents to dilute the aluminum exhaust over a large enough area before it rains. Maybe someone could do some analysis, but I don’t know how.

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The particulate matter, specifically heavy metals, go through the roof.

      There’s also a bunch of paperwork involved in removing those measurements from the pollution data sets with a rule that gives a pass for fireworks.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Waste of money? No more so than any other form of entertainment that is temporary.

    Environmentally, yeah…they’re pretty bad. Air pollution is a big issue. Some birds get killed when they run into things because they can’t see very well after being scared off by the fireworks. Any large human event is environmentally bad, like a sporting event.

    We generate literal tons of plastic and other human waste when we gather for mass entertainment.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay so we generate literal tons of waste. There are also literally hundreds of millions of us, so “tons of waste” would happen if we gathered to eat brownies distributed on napkins.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but at the end of the day we’re handing out explosives for people to play with, even kids. Just feels like it’s not the best form of celebration.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          We already know sterile environments make people allergic.

          I am actually concerned about what kind of behavioral “allergies” will arise from a society with no danger. It is not a natural state and it is not something we should be experimenting with lightly.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We already know what happens.

            Anti-vax

            Pro-war

            Pro-authoritarianism

            Anti-education

            Etc.

            Once you’ve divorced yourself completely from the dangers of watching family and people around you die from preventable diseases all the time, the horrors of actually having to live through your city destroyed and people you know be devastated by war, the crushing oppression and greed of authoritarian regimes, your education controlled specifically to prevent you from you getting any ideas about real freedoms, that’s what you get when you remove real danger from society.

            But I think you probably meant something more mundane like kids will start making graffiti or something.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, I meant more like the dangers of nature.

              Having your whole city get destroyed is an unnatural thing that comes with advanced civilization and armies. I’m totally fine with eliminating that kind of “danger” from the world.

              But the danger of riding a motorcycle, or lighting firecrackers, climbing a tree, fighting a beaver, whatever, those are dangers on the level that we evolved to deal with.

              Just like in the analogy with sterility, I’m fine with making environments free of bio weapons and meat industry goop full of mega bacteria and the kinds of biological threats that civilization itself creates. But getting rid of the base load of strange micro critters, that yes do pose some danger of sickness and even death, turns out to be taking it too far because it makes people more likely to have allergies and autoimmune problems.

              Explosives are actually predictable. Way more predictable than people or animals, for instance. A person can protect themselves when handling explosives by being careful.

              But these are just my theories about what the mechanism might be. At the higher level, by analogy it’s just there’s a system we have, that has evolved to protect us, but it’s evolved to learn from encounters with the thing it’s designed to protect us from. If you give ir no encounters, it goes haywire.

              I don’t know what the mechanism might be exactly, but I worry our ability to navigate danger might itself be a system that can go haywire.

              • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, I follow. I think we’re already there. Plenty of people are doing stupid things that are dangerous, either out of ignorance, lack of forethought, or nowadays for clout on social media. Pretty sure people have been doing dumb things for a long time, but they were more lethal in the past.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fireworks are a cool spectacle, imagine never seeing a fireworks show. Also the money isnt gone, its just changed hands.

    They probably shouldnt be how they are now though, where every individual family wants to fire their own, thats a waste and really obnoxious when its in the middle of neighborhoods. Keep it to one centralized show, away from residential areas, and everyone gets to watch a bigger show.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fireworks are a cool spectacle, imagine never seeing a fireworks show.

      Completely agree!

      Also the money isnt gone, its just changed hands.

      Not with this though. A portion of the money has changed hands, the portion that goes to paying workers and investors. Another portion of the money was used to extract, refine, and process something that just burned up and no longer exists.

      While money as an abstraction is made up, what it represents, the underlying value of society’s resources, is not, and that is unfortunately finite. So it’s also important to consider opportunity cost. That money could have been spent on other things, when you spend it on something wasteful and unnecessary that means it can’t be spent on more useful or productive things.

      All that being said, I still think fireworks are rad and worth it, but they are a waste.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Money was used to pay workers to extract, refine, and process resources. Absolutely none of the money is gone.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The money itself? Sure. But that’s not what people talk about when they talk about money, they are usually referring to what the money represents, i.e. resources, which were all burnt up and used to create that fire work when they could have gone to something else.

          i.e. if we spent some huge proportion of our money on fireworks every year, we would still have the same amount of money on paper in the economy, but absolutely everything else would cost far more. From our actual lived perspective we would be poorer.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thats just not how money works. We did spend a huge amount of our money on fireworks, things didnt become more expensive.

            • masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That is absolutely just how money works, if that same money had gone to say, healthcare companies instead of fireworks companies, we would have the same amount of paper money, and we wouldn’t have fireworks, but we’d have lower healthcare costs since we already paid some of them.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re bringing up a lot of examples that literally happen in reality and do not have the results you are claiming. Healthcare companies have been both steadily receiving more money and increasing their prices.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Money was literally invented to be an abstraction of resources. When people talk about money they usually mean resources.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    i think fireworks are nice but they’re to a large degree something from a different age and at this point we should only really be using smaller volcano-style ones, and like holy shit we have drone technology, why aren’t drone displays standard in any vaguely populated area?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lnBmYAiduo
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyEWcfn7rT0

    look at this shit, it’s so cool! can we please push for this to be the standard?

  • pugsnroses77@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    here and there are fine, I think sometimes they have their place but I’m really not a fan. the noise bothers me and I hate that people shoot them off to celebrate the same veterans that suffer ptsd during firework shows. I hope some communities start to move to drone shows in the future. https://youtu.be/pZ-zJ0Vq0FU Much quieter and leaves way more room to switch it up year to year.