• czardestructo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That number was more like 30% with a windows laptop and all the security crap Microsoft convinced my company to install. It was so painfully slow and glitchy. So I went rogue and put Linux on my company laptop 8 months ago and I’m not looking back.

    • Fecundpossum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Over here running Fedora KDE 40 on my desktop, dealing with zero issues. My use case is pretty simple, but everything I use just works, no issues.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If your use case is “pretty simple,” you’re unlikely to have problems with any operating system.

        • czardestructo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my case I’m a manager so I don’t do any real work. Linux is great for an Edge browser, ms365 paper pushing wana be engineer.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much time do we waste on car problems? Neighbor problems? Political problems? Grocery problems?

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, this seems like a pretty dumb conclusion. I expect that as far back as you look, people always took advantage of tools that save them time. But then they always also spent a fair amount of that time (that they could have been working), just maintaining/fixing/making their tools. I think the truth is that computers are very useful tools, but the maintenance and troubleshooting can be quite time consuming.

      I will continue using computers though.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using computers and also having to deal with their problems is still far more betterer than not using computers at all.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also in the context of working, this isn’t just computers. It’s tools in general, and a computer is a type of tool. Problems with your saw? Problems with your batteries? Problems with access to electricity and your extension cords not being long enough? Problem with losing your 10mm sockets? If you’re a trucker or driver the problem could be your vehicle. Etc etc etc.

      This article is stupid. Tools break, they always have and always will. The tools we have now are better than they have ever been. They will probably keep getting more and more efficient, but they will still break. Because tools break.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right and how much time do we save by having computers? Fixing the problems is just the cost of doing business

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do they include “fighting with anti patterns and dark patterns” as broken? It’s pretty insane how much misalignment there is between what most people want their computers to do and what the companies want people to do, which seems to largely be “look at ads literally everywhere”.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, because it’s still enormously complex and growing, and because, in user applications, comparing today’s XFCE to 2010’s XFCE is sad, and because comparing today’s Gnome to Gnome 2 in its prime is sad, and because comparing today’s KDE, eh, even to KDE4 - the same.

          Because it’s becoming less and less logical, wave after wave people suffering NIH syndrome and\or thinking that mimicking MacOS or Windows is very smart erode it, and because the Web is ugly and becoming uglier.

          And because CWM initial configuration takes 15 minutes to write and forget, and there’s no Wayland compositor which would take the same amount of time to set up for me, with the same easiness of use.

          Anyway, what I wrote in that comment was a subjective feeling and I’m trying to rationalize it retroactively now, which is the same as lying.

          Of course it’s what you said for Windows and MacOS users.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I too millennial to have all these problems with computers? They’ve been in our homes for about forty years now. There’s no excuse not to sit down and learn the basics of how it operates.

      • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, that’s fine, but as a Linux user I’ve fucked around a lot and spent a lot of time fixing mistakes that I did not need to make.

        I think I’m a pretty average Linux user. Who needs something that “just works” when you can break it by trying to add something you don’t need?

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Really? Because I updated and my wine prefix just broke. That was yesterday.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is so not true unless you are using some super stable old Debian release and aren’t doing complex work.

        Most DEs are super buggy, especially the darling child kde, which right off the bat makes things not super stable.

        Additionally some of the most loved distros are rolling release and inherently unstable.

        Hell, I use multiple distros daily, fedora and slackware, I also use windows for work, windows is by and large more stable in my experience.

        Slackware has kernel panics monthly, kde crashes on fedora, Wayland has too many problems to count, meaning I have to switch to x sessions all the time.

        Most GUI software I use has tons of visual glitches.

        Yes it’s tolerable, that’s why I still use it, but I wouldn’t exactly say it ‘just works’

        I would estimate I restart my fedora computer about 4-5 times more often than than the windows computer, and usually I have to restart fedora because of serious hard crashes (e.g. kde crashes so hard that I can’t even switch to a tty, meaning I need to hard reset)

        • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve not had anything like that since… forever. But then I’m not a kde nor fedora user. Naturally raises the question - have you considered switching from kde, fedora or both?

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If Linux “just worked” I would have switched years ago. I’ve used several distributions, always preferred Gnome to KDE, and even with “expert” help setting things up, I always spent way more time trying to make things work than actually having things work. Unless it’s a basic-ass workstation being used for minimal computer things or to run a server for something, there’s always something that doesn’t want to work.

            I like the idea of Linux more than I actually like using Linux. :/

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use KDE on my Linux machine, which means that I cannot develop anything involving the GPU.

          The moment I experiment a little with the API or give it wrong parameters, not only my program crashes, but the whole system freezes and I have to manually press the “power off” button.

          It does happen in windows too, however it’s 100x less unlikely.

          I also had a problem not long ago that crashing my program would not free the RAM, so every time I ran the program (and it crashed), I had 2-3GiB less of RAM. So I had to restart the computer every 10 runs or so.

          Operating systems are supposed to isolate programs and manage their resources. A program crashing under no circumstances should affect any other program. I don’t understand how it can happen.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m literally dealing with an update issue with this distro lol

        To he fair, it was perfect, literally perfect, until now. And even now, it’s not unbootable, since I can just use the previous image point. Just sucks I can’t update.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All 0.4% of the user base or whatever it is? Unless you mean among the population of server admins.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recognise the waste in waiting time, but I also think we are still increasing productivity more than enough to make up for it.

    Personally I solve it by multitasking harder. Whenever there is a waiting time for a download or other stuff I simply start doing something else. I’m not going to waste my life watching loading bars for a living.

    I don’t think increasing user-friendlyness is a good solution. It’s pretty much what caused the issues to begin with. Every time Windows or the apps make something more user-friendly it always results in more buttons to click and more updates to keep up.

    I also spend an unreasonable amount of time just rearranging the windows in comparison to back when apps had keyboard-only GUIs with functions layered in different pages or tabs. I obviously don’t think that is a good solution today either, but it goes to show that the bloated operating system has a lot of the blame.

    Say you want to do something simple like renaming a file, you’ll need to open an app to show the folders and files and also 100 different functions that are of no use for the specific task, position and scroll it where it’s visible, navigate by mouse or keyboard and then do whatever you wanted. My point is that just operating the operation system is something that requires 10s of seconds over and over again every day. There’s a long way from thought to execution for the simplest task.

    The good thing is that it enables a lot of people to do so without any training at all, so maybe that makes up for it in total.