Gargari@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agoTruly independent web browsergithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkTruly independent web browsergithub.comGargari@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square111fedilink
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agooh yeah also js isn’t very usable yet so that improves privacy
minus-squareMonkderDritte@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-23 months agoBtw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling. Because, it’s not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant.
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoidk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it’s just js that ladybird seems to have issues with
minus-squareLemongrab@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoLol, but also JS being volatile in the current browser makes it easier to fingerprint.
oh yeah also js isn’t very usable yet so that improves privacy
Btw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling.
Because, it’s not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant.
idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it’s just js that ladybird seems to have issues with
Lol, but also JS being volatile in the current browser makes it easier to fingerprint.