• AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Wait, why is his name Robobrain when his brain is the only non-robotic part? Either Robobody or Biobrain/Wetbrain would be more adequate names

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    That raises a lot of ethical concerns. It is not possible to prove or disprove that these synthetic homunculi controllers are sentient and intelligent beings.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’d wager the main reason we can’t prove or disprove that, is because we have no strict definition of intelligence or sentience to begin with.

      For that matter, computers have many more transistors and are already capable of mimicking human emotions - how ethical is that, and why does it differ from bio-based controllers?

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There is no soul in there. God did not create it. Here you go, religion serving power again.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is frustrating how relevant philosophy of mind becomes in figuring all of this out. I’m more of an engineer at heart and i’d love to say, let’s just build it if we can. But I can see how important that question “what is thinking?” Is becoming.

      • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good point. There is a theory somewhere that loosely states one cannot understand the nature of one’s own intelligence. Iirc it’s a philosophical extension of group/set theory, but it’s been a long time since I looked into any of that so the details are a bit fuzzy. I should look into that again.

        At least with computers we can mathematically prove their limits and state with high confidence that any intelligence they have is mimicry at best. Look into turing completeness and it’s implications for more detailed answers. Computational limits are still limits.

      • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think we should still do it, we probably will never understand unless we do it, but we have to accept the possibility that if these synths are indeed sentient then they also deserve the basic rights of intelligent living beings.

        • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Slow down… they may deserve the basic rights of living beings, not living intelligent beings.

          Lizards have brains too, but these are not more intelligent than lizards.

          You would try not to step on a lizard if you saw it on the ground, but you wouldn’t think oh, maybe the lizard owns this land, I hope I don’t get sued for trespassing.

      • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        But if we do that, how will we maximize how much money we make off of it? /s

    • sugartits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nah it’s okay. I was called all sorts of names and told I was against progress when I raised such concerns, so obviously I was wrong…

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are about 90 billion neurons on a human brain. From the article:

      …researchers grew about 800,000 brain cells onto a chip, put it into a simulated environment

      that is far less than I believe would be necessary for anything intelligent emerge from the experiment

  • Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Which means we may see full organic to digital conversion within he next half century

    Ethical horrors aside, been wondering if that would happen in the forseeable future or not

  • EisFrei@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Murderbot.

    Murrrderbooooot.

    800,000 brain cells played pong.

    Creepy.

    That’s murderbot’s ancestor.