• radfrog@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The “of course” makes it clear you dislike the outcome. The long mention of the men who in your eyes “caused” this also makes it pretty obvious what your stance is about this and who you want the scapegoat to be in the discussion.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The “of course” makes it clear you dislike the outcome

      Only inasmuch as a desirable outcome would have been the lowering of the age of retirement for men to either that of women or meeting both on the middle. The issue is that the government being the government took it as an excuse to effectively cut welfare.

      The long mention of the men who in your eyes “caused” this

      To be honest it probably just brought it on sooner. The government would have found it as excuse to raise the retirement age without it being highlighted to them.

      also makes it pretty obvious what your stance is about this and who you want the scapegoat to be in the discussion.

      No, still don’t see it.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Wow that’s some projection. You are reading deeply between the lines to find your take on that one.

      I immediately got it as “why would the people in power ever make it easier for those not” but hey why bother with nuanced takes when the Internet will allow you to be angry at your specific beliefs as if they are the only truth, right?