Have you went down any internet rabbit holes only to come out with a deep set existential crisis? If so, what are they?

  • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In the old Star Wars Expanded Universe, there was mention of a Shawken Device which, if operable, could destroy the universe.

    This has led me to conclude that the universe probably isn’t infinite.

    In an infinite universe, all possible things should be happening at the same time. This would necessarily mean that someone invented a device/mechanism/reaction that could destroy the universe, and successfully activated it, thus ending the universe.

    There are only two possible conclusions that I can draw from this thought experiment, which are not mutually exclusive:

    1. The universe is not infinite, and/or
    2. It is not possible to destroy the universe.
    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago
      1. The universe is almost definitely not infiinte, but we will never be able to prove it.
      2. Have you heard of vacuum decay?
      • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s only infinite in the sense that it’s beyond our measurement. And whether or not it is infinite doesn’t even matter to us because of the speed of light and the expansion of space itself. There is a sphere around us that is all we will ever know or experience or be able to affect. Outside that sphere other things can and do exist, but we are fundamentally separated from them forever. There are entire galaxies we will never see because the light will never reach us. That is wild to me.

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Have you heard of vacuum decay?

        I know, right? They barely make consumer grade products that last nowadays.

    • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Relativity proved that time isn’t a constant thing where all things occur at “the present”. You can have situations where person 1 sees an event happen as A B and person 2 sees that same event happen as B A.

      That means time isn’t some absolute framework that reality exists in, but something more like a property of matter or space or something.

      Also the speed of light seems to be applicable here. Or more accurately, the speed at which events propagate through space. If you pushed a button to end the universe wouldn’t that event only go at light speed out in all directions? So maybe the button has been pushed (maybe an infinite number of times too) and all the shockwaves just haven’t gotten here yet.

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You can have situations where person 1 sees an event happen as A B and person 2 sees that same event happen as B A.

        This is only true if A and B are not causally related. If A causes B all observers will see A causing B.

        • Colonel Panic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Are you 100% on that? I thought it was recently proved that it actually could be reversed. Maybe I misunderstood. Thinking about this stuff makes my brain feel fuzzy and numb, but like, more than usual.

    • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      In an infinite universe, all possible things should be happening at the same time

      Misunderstanding of infinity.

      E.g.: 1.101100111000… is an infinitely long number, yet it will never be bigger than 1.2 nor smaller than 1.1, it does not contain all digits, nor does it contain all possible combinations of 0s and 1s.