In a recent interview with The New York Times, Whitmer was asked why President Joe Biden has so far struggled to earn widespread credit for the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law among voters.
Her response? Voters have been worn out by the pandemic and many just haven’t been tuned in to what’s happening in Washington.
“I think the pandemic’s taken a toll. People are stressed out,” Whitmer told the Times. “They’re just trying to pay the grocery bill, get the kids off to school, show up at their job, and maybe get a little bit of sleep at night. They’re not consuming everything.”
This is the best summary I could come up with:
When Gretchen Whitmer first ran for the Michigan governorship in 2018, she pledged to “fix the damn roads.”
In a recent interview with The New York Times, Whitmer was asked why President Joe Biden has so far struggled to earn widespread credit for the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law among voters.
"They’re just trying to pay the grocery bill, get the kids off to school, show up at their job, and maybe get a little bit of sleep at night.
Whitmer, a cochair of Biden’s reelection campaign and a figure often touted as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, remarked that Democrats have to go out and effectively speak with voters about the merits of the infrastructure overhaul and laws like the CHIPS Act — which was crafted to turbocharge semiconductor manufacturing in the United States.
But voters in recent surveys have only given him a slight edge on the issue compared to Trump — who floated infrastructure reforms numerous times during his presidency but failed to produce a concrete framework for lawmakers.
In a Politico-Morning Consult poll conducted in April, 40% of registered voters said Biden had done more on infrastructure upgrades and job creation, while 37% of respondents selected Trump.
The original article contains 294 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 32%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
GENOCIDE
wtf is wrong with the NYT?!?
Maybe the probelm with people’s lives doesn’t have anything to do with the quality of the roads. Maybe the fact that people are dependent on those roads should be examined?
Improving roads has secondary effects. First is people must be paid to do the work, meaning money in laborers pockets, though I’m sure execs are also lining their pockets…
Second, goods and services use roads, notably highways and interstates.
Third, better roads do allow cities that are reasonably close together to benefit from each other. Smaller cities with less jobs can have people commute to wherever the jobs are, typically in larger cities.
I agree that the states are too dependent on vehicle infrastructure, but we definitely still need it.
1.2 Trillion dollars could build a coast to coast high-speed rail system with spurs through every major city in America.
Damn those ungrateful peasants, don’t they see the government is doing a bare minimum?!
