• magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re making them unsafe? You and your bullshit are making them unsafe. Every comment you post reeks of your true character. Go get help.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You are projecting your need for professional therapy. You are so blind from anger, you are a complete utter failure at maintaining composure and thinking through things with a calm, composed mind.

      I do not need to clarify my position. It is clear if you have a clear mind, which you do not. Just to repeat, AI drawings are not a CSAM problem, but a lethal weapon for defamation and libel.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m making kids unsafe by…

      checks notes

      …being firmly and unwaveringly against the sexual exploitation of children.

      I really can’t stress enough that this was an actual 15 year old girl who was pornified with AI. This isn’t some “erotic drawings” argument, the end results were photorealistic nudes with her unmodified face. This isn’t some completely AI generated likeness. Pictures of her from social media were exploited to remove her clothes and fill in the gaps with models trained on porn. It was nonconsensual pornography of a kid.

      Anyone who read this story, and feels the need to defend what was done to this girl is a fucking monster.

      I can’t believe that the person defending sex crimes of this magnitude is a fucking mod.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        shield
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I can’t believe that the person defending sex crimes of this magnitude is a fucking mod

        Can you describe where I did exactly this? You might be violating rules by falsely accusing people of things they did not do.

        Asking this as a mod. I would prefer an answer in the next 24 hours for the reputation damage you are trying to attempt to do to me. I will not hesitate to take action against such a deplorable act. Lemmy mods are not like this.

        And considering I have not deleted any of my comments, I am fairly transparent here simply trying to discuss.

        Edit: since you are active right now, you must provide an answer within two hours

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
            shield
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Since you are also labelling me as a pedophile/loli fan, I would prefer you provide evidence of the same. Failing to do so will require to take moderator actions.

            Justifying your absurdity using hivemind baiting tactics may work on Reddit, but this is Lemmy.

            • magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Refute literally anything I said? My post history in this thread, mostly replying to you, is still present. My absurdity? You’ll go down as the laughing stock you are right now. Only need to take a quick look around this thread to realize your view on this is unpopular. “this is Lemmy”, yeah, and apparently people like you still exist on the internet. You’re defending/playing down the production and consumption of photorealistic sexual imagery depicting a REAL underage girl.