• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, that’s curious. I’d think they’d be prepared with Signal at the very least and some backup self-hosted channel, as well as cameras and backup cell hotspots.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      they were prepared for the drone hit the other day; so hopefully for this as well.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d imagine they could have a few spread out boats further and further behind, each with its own cell hotspot, beaming WiFi all around, so that they have to be jammed simultaneously to stop the livestreams from capturing the attacks.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          it sounds like it would be easier to pick them off one-by-one if they were far apart.

          • fodor@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What difference would that make? If someone who does have big guns wants to take them out, they’re going to end up at the bottom of the sea regardless of how clustered the boats are.

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, based on the source, they’re still even on Twitter which is a lot more overtly fascist than WhatsApp. So…yeah…

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Did they select Whatsapp as a main communication channel and direct their supporters to it?

    Or did they just start a group chat to reach out to supporters who were already on the app?

  • incentive@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I use WhatsApp cautiously with friends who still refuse to jump over to Signal (let alone Matrix or Session). But it’s def mind blowing to read an activist group was relying on it for organizing. Reminds me of FB being used for organizing G20 and BLM demos -_-

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Considering their entire marketing campaign is “nobody, not even WhatsApp can see your messages,” I can see how folks would fall for that.

    • ctry21@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think a lot of non-techie people only know signal from the Trump admin using it illegally earlier in the year. In a lot of people’s minds because of that they think Signal = insecure because they don’t get the nuances of why using it in that specific context – on personal phones, using a third party app, with a random journalist in the mix – was bad, but that for most people it’s still one of the best options. WhatsApp on the other hand has a lot of marketing around it and if you didn’t know that Meta is Facebook I think some people wouldn’t even realise who the owners are.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had a friend who heard signal was backdoored and that a regular old cell call was more secure. Had to correct that

        • rapchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          wasn’t it telegram that got hacked?
          also i vaguely remember the signal ceo getting sued or something because they couldn’t/wouldn’t let some government body read someone’s messages, because it’s encrypted

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is yet another reason why you don’t use whatsapp

      ftfy

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Was this their main channel of communication or just a group they had for supporters?

    • paaviloinen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t really matter, it’s the metadata that reveals your connections and locations. Surprisingly big amount of useful (but not necessarily correct or verifiable) intel can be gathered without eavesdropping into the actual conversations. People have been - on other occasions - targeted because they were connected to a person, who’s connections may have been suspicious to some state actors.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Huh? I was just curious, because it’s quite different if they used this as their main-channel. Using WhatsApp for that would be crazy.

    • Korkki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Totally consistent Meta is joined at the hip with US government and therefore more or less in league with Zionists, neocons and Israel just like every american big tech, bank and media company.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Sounds like this group is more of a social media vibe group, rather then a group interested in real undermining of Zionism. Maybe stop being pawns for slacktivists with rich parents and try joining the PLO instead?

  • appropriateghost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    another reason why not to use whatsapp? for all that is good, don’t use meta or any corporate technofascist company. there are better options.