Anti-natalism is the philosophical value judgment that procreation is unethical or unjustifiable. Antinatalists thus argue that humans should abstain from making children. Some antinatalists consider coming into existence to always be a serious harm. Their views are not necessarily limited only to humans but may encompass all sentient creatures, arguing that coming into existence is a serious harm for sentient beings in general. There are various reasons why antinatalists believe human reproduction is problematic. The most common arguments for antinatalism include that life entails inevitable suffering, death is inevitable, and humans are born without their consent. Additionally, although some people may turn out to be happy, this is not guaranteed, so to procreate is to gamble with another person’s suffering. WIKIPEDIA
If you think, maybe for a few years, like 10-20 years, no one should make babies, and when things get better, we can continue, then you are not an anti-natalist. Anti-natalists believe that suffering will always be there and no one should be born EVER.
This photo was clicked by a friend, at Linnahall.
No technology has ever had this effect. There is a culture of extraction and reductionism. That is the real problem at the moment. With great improvements in efficiency comes enormous potential to expand. We are actually on the cusp of potentially accessing the resources of a near Earth m-type astroid. While it is not a major media talking point, this will change everything about civilization and is the catalyst for the first near Earth and cislunar colonies. A single gravitationally differentiated planetesimal core fragment, known as an m-type astroid can easily contain more rare mineral resource wealth than all that humans have accessed in the Holocene. The only reason humans have not built O’Neill cylinders yet is because of wealth and infrastructure. That is the long term future of humans once we shed the idiotic shackles of mythology and inbred conservatism.
The West is shackled by inherited wealth. Business acumen is not hereditary. All systems without meritocratic hierarchy stagnate and fail. Asia is poised to take the future, on the current trajectory, as it has better meritocratic checks and balances to protect against the cancer of conservative stagnation, cronyism, and the exploitation that the incompetent always turn to as the only reliable form of investment.
You have no land to farm, and lack the skills, like we all do. The population is much too large for the systems and infrastructure, but this kind of stupidity leads to most people dying a terrible death. I despise any monster pushing such stupidity. The Earth is more than capable of sustaining much larger populations for tens of thousands of years before the accessible resources are depleted and space colonies become the only solution. That requires us to access the final age of technology – mastery of biology as a fully understood engineering field. We are still a couple of centuries away from that achievement. The Armageddon nihilism is pure psychosis. Once there are real space colonies, there must be a shift to sustainable self regulating technology. That will become biological systems management. Such a system has a much different set of constraints that do not allow anonymous exploitation of global resources like an atmosphere. Heat dissipation is the primary constraint. All of this requires expansion of infrastructure and growth of economic wealth to remain relevant. Asia is investing in that future while elsewhere conservativism is cashing out the future with reductionism. The future is held by those that are given value and reinvest it. Time and efficiency are a gift of wealth. Those that extract that wealth, extract their future relevance. It is little worse than those that cut off their own lifeline in old age from a similar spurious mass social psychosis.
I agree with some of this,
but it should be noted that spaceflight is becoming kind of a modern mythology that describes the “fate” of humans.
I think you got some nice ideas but you really gotta work on your messaging. As it is, it’s one big blob of text, and that’s hard to read and parse through. It would be better if you can summarize your points in maybe 1-3 short bullet points, something like:
This will make it much easier for other people to parse your points and comprehend them quickly.
Also you gotta be realistic and realize what’s at stake. If spaceflight takes up pace slower than you think, i.e. it takes 10 years longer for humans to set foot on another planet, that is already an economic crisis for the people alive today and needs to be tackled. Reducing the number of workers in a country is a way to reduce unemployment rate and it is simply important to realize how serious the situation is and how urgent it is to get this right. We can still do spaceflight by the way.
You’re still stuck on killing people. It is embedded in your lack of broad scope ethics and implications beyond your awareness. It is a cultural problem. Most of it is narcissistic and reflective of irrational hubris. Don’t get into politics.