• prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wait.

    The USA that supports and has supported a 2 state solution is the problem, over Israel the aggressor who doesn’t?

    Got it.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If the us supported the two state solution, they wouldn’t have vetoed Palestine’s UN membership.

    • Old_Geezer@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The USA that supports and has supported a 2 state solution

      Do you actually believe the USA? Their actions don’t support their words, IMHO. “Proof is in the pudding”.

      • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes and I even know what it means.

        I’ve also been conscious for the past 4 decades and can see the difference between an enabler acting in their own self interests and the enabled who ultimately is responsible for their actions.

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          US self-interest in the region would involve greater investment in Saudi Arabia at the cost of Israel.

          The best interests of world peace would involve brokering deals between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

          Israel is an outsized power in the region solely because of US support and funding. The solution to that is simple.