• Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Was that even true for comparable CPU’s? I feel this was only for their N100’s etc.

      • Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Nah all the am4 cpus have abysmal idle power, the am5 got a little better as far as i know but the infinity fabric was a nightmare for the idle power.

        • Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Well I concede, I guess there was one metric they were better at. Doing absolutely nothing.

        • notthebees@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          What about the monolithic socs? Idle power on my 5825u is better than my i5-1135g7. My i7-8550u is in between.

          • Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Ahh yes idle=not using computer and using computer=100% cpu usage. There is no such thing as “reading a pdf document” or “surfing the web”.

                  • Quatlicopatlix@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    If the system is powered the cpu is always doing something. Idle doesnt mean that your pc is off it just means no “real” load. Modern cpus are so powerfull that browsing the web is no real cpu load. It may be a few % difference than just the os itself but windows backround tasks will propably make more impakt on the cpu load.