wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comexternal-linkmessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comwikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square50linkfedilink
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoTheir point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
minus-squareSckharshantallas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoYou toll totally misunderstood the comment.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoBait used to be believable
I don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
Their point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
You toll totally misunderstood the comment.
Bait used to be believable