There’s currently rumors, he had bruises on his hands, hasn’t been seen in public in the last few days and his schedule for the next few days has been cleared. It’s rumored that he even cancelled his golf session.

JD Vance said that trump is healthy but he’d be ready to take over if anything would happen.

Also the pentagon pizza place is busy.

    • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah that’s true. I just think Wikipedia is the worst source one can use to support an argument. So anything below that is basically just “trust me bro” to me.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Once upon a time it was, but it’s pretty reliable now. It very clearly cites sources and has warnings for when things don’t have sources.

        • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          It does cite sources, however, many times I have tried checking sources only to find lackluster support for the statements being made in Wikipedia.

          Just today I was looking at this page: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigaer_94

          It states, that the building in question was given to a Jewish organization, linking to 2 sources:

          1997 wurde das Haus an die Jewish Claims Conference übertragen[2][3]

          Looking at the sources, they just seem to claim that the building was once owned by a Jew. This explains why it might have been given to that organization, but it’s no proof for the statement being made.

          I found several things like this over the years. I’d say this is a good 10% of the sources I bother checking.

          Maybe German Wikipedia is worse somehow?

          All that being said, I do trust Wikipedia mostly. I’m just saying, it’s the bare minimum IMO.

        • trakata@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          It’s not just reliable, it’s well sourced and has a consensus of perennial sources from news agencies that are well known by people who give a shit about truth to report facts down to the gravesite, and they clearly list organizations that have slid down the scale of integrity in order to colour corruptive, enshittifying tendrils accurately.

          It is no less than one of the largest open and collaborative human works of knowledge and truth from all stripes, colours and ideologies blended and distilled into neutral-as-possible articles that exist.

          This pizzint ad slop on the other hand is agitprop bullshit for gullible rubes; google popular times ratings of restaurants as a metric isn’t a clever lateral thinking rubric inferring calamity.

          People don’t rate shit and Joe the firefighter isn’t housing ‘za while saving people from cooking, let’s get real.

      • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        80% of /r/politics: dailybeast thehill newsweek slam a melt down on a rage or whatever. 50k updoots to the left pls