Copying this from Reddit (I still get the daily emails). Since I no longer post there, I figured I would ask here, and include my prediction: Will be more popular, possibly in stable release. Still won’t be able to rotate photos natively.

  • conrad82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I tried it briefly, but when I realized I could not easily sync a bunch of my pictures from server to new phone, I lost interest and went back to syncthing

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just out of curiosity, what’s the use case for having all your photos actually on the phone as opposed to remote access from your phone?

      • conrad82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Backup, redundancy, easy access… If my server goes down I don’t have the time to fix it at the moment.

        Also the photos app on my phone is quite good, so I find it very easy to find old pictures quickly.

        I also prefer offline-capable solutions

      • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        If the internet disappears or you lose access to it for some reason, you can still see your photos.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You can survive a day trip without access to your photos. We managed just fine before smartphones brought that practice into the mainstream.

            • roofuskit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              That would be an insane amount of phone storage. I don’t think a single available smart phone could sync an entire professional library of photos. Especially considering how large each photo is.

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 minutes ago

                  Man, you’re the one who came in and said Immich could be used by professional photographers. Don’t make dumbshit statements and then get pissy when others explain how you’re wrong.

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              A professional photographer doesn’t use cloud storage to store the GBs of RAW files from their shoots

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Why not? They absolutely should be using something like Backblaze. In fact someone who has digital photos as their business would be dumb not to use cloud storage.

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  14 minutes ago

                  You’re not uploading to Backblaze as you shoot photos. You’re dumping the SD cards, or saving RAW files directly, onto a fileserver or computer of some sort.

                  Nobody in their right mind would use Immich or GPhotos for that kind of thing, which is what this chain was about. Backblaze is a completely different scenario, for backing up data after the fact.