it’s a torture stream. there’s no fucking nuance. you sound like the people who are on the fence about gaza.
either you think people should be able to consent to being tortured on stream to death so a corporation can profit, or you don’t. there’s not a middle ground. I don’t give a shit whether the people doing the torturing feel like they’re being censored. they’re sadistic filth.
Censorship is a major problem in the world today, and encouraging more of it is something we need to be wary of.
I don’t see how the platform should be responsible without opening up a can of worms involving censorship.
Seeing as he was an active participant in it, this is the core of my questioning. Why is it considered ‘something others did to him’, and not ‘something he did to himself’? He could have left at any time, but he chose to stay and remain in the activity.
However I’m unclear that it’s actually illegal. Morally reprehensible, but morality is a very subjective opinion and one I’m very hesitant to let platforms start deciding on my behalf.
Nobody has ever denied that censorship can sometimes be good. The problem has always been who gets to decide when it’s good and when it isn’t?
Yeah, I don’t see how they’re responsible either, but I’m getting lots of emotional replies and nobody actually seems to want to admit they’re advocating censorship.
The argument against them, as I understand it, is that they should not have allowed the streaming to happen. As this was pre-death, that would have required them to make a decision about what content they allowed that most people would consider censorship.
nah, fam, I get your discussion points. I just think they’re shitty fucking points and you sound like some MAGA chud whining about censorship.
Oh OK, just realised this is an alt of one of those accounts with a modlog a mile long. Yeah just fuck off, I’m not interested in engaging. Everybody else has managed a perfectly civil discussion until you arrived.
it’s a torture stream. there’s no fucking nuance. you sound like the people who are on the fence about gaza.
either you think people should be able to consent to being tortured on stream to death so a corporation can profit, or you don’t. there’s not a middle ground. I don’t give a shit whether the people doing the torturing feel like they’re being censored. they’re sadistic filth.
Yeah… Maybe read the fucking discussion points before chiming in. I love how you think I’m on the side of the fucking corporation.
nah, fam, I get your discussion points. I just think they’re shitty fucking points and you sound like some MAGA chud whining about censorship.
Oh OK, just realised this is an alt of one of those accounts with a modlog a mile long. Yeah just fuck off, I’m not interested in engaging. Everybody else has managed a perfectly civil discussion until you arrived.
how dare you censor me by not listening to what I have to say! what, you can watch torture streams, but can’t handle people being mean to you online?
what a snowflake