• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Very few workers want to own their means of production. They just want a paycheck for their labor.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because very few workers possess class conciousness due to decades of capitalist propaganda.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s more that investing in the place you work sucks because you know how shit of an investment it is. Most people would rather own shares in the s&p500 than their place of work.

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Investment Capital should not be a prerequisite for workers to own their means of production.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            So they should just be made responsible for tens of thousands of dollars worth of equipment because they worked there for a week.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s not a prerequisite. It’s just an option that’s available to anyone who wants to own part of a publicly traded company. If you want to own it in the traditional sense go be a tradie plenty of tradies run their own operations.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think thats for the following reasons. Because the c manager understands the value of investment long term and they believe they can impact the company in a positive way. They also likely have more disposable income.

            A factory line worker has very little control over the performance of the company. He wants his weekly pay to be in full cash and that’s it because he either has less disposable income or doesnt understand the value of investment.

            If the line worker wants to invest he would likely invest in another company than his own unless his company was preforming exceptionally well.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              If workers were the owners they would also have decision-making power.

              This isn’t just about stock options, ownership in a holistic sense involves control.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        An owner/operator does not own a share of a large corporation. The idea of the workers controlling the means of production is that the workers collectively own the company, not that each worker owns their own dump truck.

        As for most people not wanting that, I wonder if that would be true if they understood it meant that they got a share of the profits on top of their regular paycheck?

    • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s more like, imagine if all the shares of Amazon were confiscated from Bezos and his main henchmen and his original remaining backers, and then those shares were equally redistributed to Amazon employees and contractors. I don’t think the workers would disagree with that move.