Conservative-dominated court restores books denounced by officials as ‘pornographic filth’ to school libraries

An appellate court has ruled that Texas cannot ban books from libraries simply because they mention “butt and fart” and other content which some state officials may dislike.

The fifth US circuit court of appeals issued its decision on Thursday in a 76-page majority opinion, which was written by Judge Jacques Wiener Jr and opened with a quote from American poet Walt Whitman: “The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.”

In its decision, the appellate court declared that “government actors may not remove books from a public library with the intent to deprive patrons of access to ideas with which they disagree”.

  • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Didn’t Trump fart all the time while in court? I’d expect them to love farts and huff them all the time. Their lord and savior deemed it good enough for his behind, so it shall be good enough for their noses. It was his political statement, banning farts from books is political motivated terrorism or something like that, I don’t know. I’m not insane enough to understand their intentions.

  • Aganim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Imagine being all worked up about books mentioning raging obscenities like ‘butt’ and ‘fart’, only to get slapped in the face by Judge ‘Wiener’. 😂

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Imagine having that much of an issue with barely offensive words that their kids will never read because most don’t use the school library anyway.

      And imagine letting your kids come home and access whatever media they want including actual pornography on the internet. Most of these parents have zero clue how to block internet sites on their home computers and laptops let alone the phones that their kids all have.

      But of course, that’s another problem some parents are asking the government to solve by forcing porn sites to require visitors to affirmatively identify themselves and their age. Of course, that only applies to the major porn sites that play by the arbitrary rules anyway. All so stupid.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anyone else thinking that this Judge would have gotten his autobiography banned for profanity just for the name?

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      for extra effect, I recommend reading through the opinion first before imagining. The high quality of the writing really accentuates the ludicrous degree of clown shit on display from the GOP.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      To be fair, he didn’t have to make it that long.

      On the other hand, we wouldn’t have gotten this:

      • Seven “butt and fart” books, with titles like I Broke My Butt! and Larry the Farting Leprechaun;

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The primary opinion is only 27 pages. The rest is a three page concurrence a 46 page dissent by Duncan.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    And these old farts are complaining about how “soft” today’s youth are? They really need to get their heads out of their butts.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I swear Captain Underpants already negated this like a decade ago lol

  • hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unfortunately, we know how this is going to go: “If you won’t let us ban books from the library, we’ll just ban the library.”

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Already happening in some places. Local governments are cutting library funding because they don’t like the some of the content that their libraries are stocking, but the courts won’t let them ban it all.

  • BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The desenting opinion called the court the “library police” for refusing to let the state police the library.