The more I hear people talk about it who aren’t cis-het men, the more I hear criticism about the concept. But so far, I’ve only heard people say that it’s stupid, that it’s not a thing, that it’s men’s own fault etc. But I’ve yet to understand where that criticism comes from. I don’t want to start a discussion on whether or not it’s real or not. I just want to understand where the critics are coming from.

  • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d say there’s some unavoidable bias there. If we judge the dominant masculine culture by the degree to which people emphasize masculinity then of course the loud ultra masculine people will seem like the representation.

    Lots of men out there just being men

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lots of men out there just being men

      True. But nobody cares about them because they aren’t bothering anyone. But they do get lumped in with the controversial men.

      Like I don’t have much of a clue about Tate or any of that stuff. But if I tell people that then I’m guilty of ignorance or something and I need to ‘educate’ myself about that stuff so I can… denounce it? Because apparently just not knowing or caring is complicity or something.

      • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s true that men as a broad group have a duty to confront and correct that behavior within their social groups and families etc. and that might be where that sentiment is coming from, but we live in a world where people can and do live in bubbles.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          No. We don’t. We don’t have a duty to do anything anymore than women do.

          Other people’s ignorance isn’t my obligation to fix. It’s their own. I am not responsible for other people’s behavior and anyone who blames me for it is an asshole. Guilt by association is a fallacy.

          • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 hours ago

            If you’re not calling out that kind of behavior when you encounter it among your social group then you are definitely complicit. Is it a morally corrupt position? Not necessarily, but you’re complicit and you’re enabling it.

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Calling out shitty behaviour gets you shitcanned from the group. It doesn’t change the behaviour. Do you socialize much? You don’t make friends or get popular by calling out bad behaviour. You get ostracized. The rest of the group calls you an asshole and circles the wagons and enables the behaviour further.