Vim doesn’t care if it’s running in Linux or Windows or macOS

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Linux tends to get out of your way to let you get shit done. Windows tends to be a marketing platform for Microsoft products that lets you get shit done.

    I don’t see why my office computer needs some xbox app I can’t uninstall.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    But with Linux, you can init=/bin/vim

    Why settle for running vim on your os when vim can just be your os?

  • Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Number one, I get to tell people that I use Arch. I could anyway, but this way I’m not lying.

    Number two, it’s not Micro$oft or Crapple.

    Number three, living in my mother’s basement isn’t as cost effective as I was hoping it’d be so free helps immensely.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      But I also do spend 8 hours a work day coding in Vim not on Linux. Just to clarify, I’m also not using Windows (gross).

  • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Makes dumb people feel smart.

    Gives people who lack agency in life something they use to look down on others, despite no one caring.

    For a tiny majority that have them. It is a useful red flag for your loved ones, that the slide of mental illness continues.

    They secretly desire to be seen as hackers by others; reality is they are hacks.

    They lack the ability to enjoy self deprecating humor and handle feelings but this is most often expressed by downvoting.

    The inky blackness of terminal screens to sates their inner emo.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      LOL me writing this, using neovim and a split keyboard to make me feel smart. There is definitly some truth to this. But I never look down upon people for not using the technology I choose. People on here can be really annoying. It’s like the virtue signaling Linux.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Makes dumb people feel smart

      The entirety of bioinformatics runs on Linux. I doubt you’d be able to clear an entry level exam to join a bioinformatics program.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        They are all downvoting my shit comment to a shitpost, so they’re all proving it correct.

        Most people who use Linux don’t tie their personality to it. I’ve long suspected that Lemmy has few of those.

          • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s a shit posting sub. This is how it works. It’s not anyone’s safe place. Feelings are the punchline here.

            • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              But you’re not, like, being clever or fun. It’s just really crude self validating antagonism where you declare that any engagement is you winning.

              It’s crass, juvenile, disingenuous, unsophisticated, and, worst of all; not providing anything to your audience, not even trying to be funny. It serves only to highlight your vices.

              Which, you know, can come off if youve got some literary chops, if you ride the lightning between kauffman and plath, or try to do your best rick sanchez. But this isn’t that. It’s not even a failed attempt to be that. You’re using your computer as an excuse to ignore the humanity of others so you can abuse that humanity for human validation.

              It is an inchoate display of the ugliness that chokes your otherwise empty little heart.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    1. Lighter
    2. Better on weaker hardware
    3. More options how you set up your system: Desktop Environments/Window Managers.
    4. Free and Open Source (so no paying out the arse for Windows).
    5. More Software options.
    6. Better Security.
    7. No monitoring by your OS provider.
    • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Seriously, do people pay for windows? I’ve transitioned one copy I got on my laptop a dozen years ago through a few separate pc builds. And duplicated another key, which was quite easy. The verifications for windows are super easy to bypass by a non-tech intelligent user

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        do people pay for windows?

        Yes. When you buy your computer, the cost of Windows is added onto the computer’s cost. Just for context, a Dell XPS 13 Laptop with Ubuntu preinstalled is £1,149.01, with Windows it’s £1,199.00. When you get the chance to have Linux preinstalled or even just have no OS pre installed, you find it’s cheaper than having Windows Preinstalled.

          • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s the same for desktops. There’s no difference between Operating systems for laptops or desktops. Your can use the same install media for both with little to no difference.

              • Xatolos@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                How many basic users do you think build their own desktops and not just buy a pre built?

                This was about how many normal people buy Windows, not how many of a very small percentage/niche buy Windows. Please don’t move the goal post mid-game.

  • Kerm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It depends on the user. If you’ll install GNU/Linux distribution as a nooby, choose some easy distribution - most probably it will install a lot of bloatware, and possibly could be unstable… But if you’ll go into details and learn the basic you could install some better distro, which you will install manually, and you will install all you need, no bloat. If you will, here are the perks:

    • Stability (it also depends on your hardware… NVIDIA for example is pretty bad, but Intel or AMD is great. Must be better stability than on Windows, if you’ll not fk up)
    • Performance (since you installed everything by yourself, and you will have no bloat, telemetry and etc. you will run the OS with great performance)
    • Security (vulns on big distros are getting fixed fastly, and there are less vulns than on Windows, also less viruses you could get on a desktop)
    • Customizability (you could change anything you want, desktop environment, sometimes init system, pretty much anything but it depends on a distro and your skills)

    Me, as a… I would say half a professional GNU/Linux user, would recommend Void Linux for half-experienced or experienced user, because I like the runit init system and the stability, even though it’s rolling model.

    But for a newbie… I don’t know. All of them I tried - they had problems. So it’s better to either endure, either start from a not-so-hard distro like Void Linux.

    EDIT: oh yeah… I read a lot of comments here and I would also add that the system is free, open-source (with Linux-libre), and it’s also not so bad at gaming since Steam made Proton, a fork of Wine (Wine Is Not an Emulator). I also game sometimes and I use Lutris… Don’t know if there any other cooler alternative heh.

  • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Gaming. I know Steam has done a lot for Linux gaming but most game developers focus on Windows.

    Not all games run on Linux and some require extra steps. Some wont run on Linux, period. Driver supports and new features are always windows first.

    Some people use other store fronts, other than Steam. It is a pain to run them on Linux. there are several launchers on Linux but they don’t work for all games and support is not consistent.

    For gaming, it is still windows, not Linux or Mac OS.

  • moleverine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    What finally pushed me over the edge was when I was trying to fix something in Windows and it said I couldn’t access that part of the OS. Bitch, you work for me, not the other way around. I’ve flopped back and forth between Linux and Windows for decades and just decided that anything I couldn’t do in Linux I just wouldn’t do. So far, I haven’t really encountered anything. With how much of my average computing is done in a browser these days, Firefox doesn’t really care which OS it’s running on.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, you actually own it for one, given Linux is an open platform, you’re generally not at some corporation’s will unlike with closed platforms like Windows or even macOS, you’re also not arbitrarily locked out of running it on hardware made before a certain date unlike with Win11; as long as the kernel supports it, it should run on your hardware, where Windows arbitrarily locks out anything older than Zen+ or Kaby Lake without a modded install medium starting with Win11, and it generally uses less resources than Windows nowadays although that varies based on configuration.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I honestly don’t know. Every OS has its goods & bads. But generally I think it just comes down to whatever’s available. Personally, I use:
    Windows on my work laptop (because that’s what they gave me),
    MacOS on my personal laptop (because I like it),
    Ubuntu on my home automation / media server (because it was free).

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Similar here but in reverse

      • macOSX on my work laptop
      • windows n my home laptop
      • raspbian and Ubuntu on my home servers
      • Rocky and Amazon Linux on my work servers
      • but realistically most of my non-work activity is on iOS
      • moseschrute@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago
        • macOS on my work laptop. As an app developer this is my only option
        • macOS on my personal laptop. As an app developer this is my only option
        • raspbian on my home server
        • daily drive iOS
        • I dabble in Android on the side, but mostly just to test my apps

        But I pretty much just need Tmux, Neovim, and a browser for 80% of my work and I’m happy. 10% of that is running an XCode build and the other 10% is macOS and iOS working really nicely together.