• cor@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    if they make it almost exactly the same and “credit” it in the smallest font possible and didn’t get permission from the original author… i would say that’s definitely a ripoff

    • elvith@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      didn’t get permission from the original author

      Tell me you don’t know xkcd without saying you don’t know xkcd. These comics are licensed as CC-BY-NC 2.5, which means you are allowed to remix and use them, without explicitly asking for permission, as long as you attribute the original/author (which is given here) and as long as you do it non-commercially (which is given for this post IMHO).

      • cor@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.

        that’s not attribution.

      • cor@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Tell me you don’t know xkcd without saying you don’t know xkcd.

        tell me you’re completely uncreative without telling me you’re completely uncreative.

        the rest of what i said stands… but whooooa you “got me” i didn’t read the license on xkcd