themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agoThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThis CEO laid off nearly 80% of his staff because they refused to adopt AI fast enough. 2 years later, he says he’d do it againfortune.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 29 days agomessage-square114linkfedilink
minus-squareMysteriousSophon21@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·28 days agoTechnical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
minus-squaremedem@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·28 days ago…which is why I categorically refuse to use the term Artificial intelligence .
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·28 days agoSo it’s the CEO they should replace.
minus-squareEnd-Stage-Ligma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-228 days ago it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistency. Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.
Technical staff were skeptical because they actually know what AI can and can’t do reliably in production environments - it’s good at generating content but terrible at logical reasoning and mission-critical tasks that require consistancy.
…which is why I categorically refuse to use the term Artificial intelligence .
So it’s the CEO they should replace.
Thank goodness nobody is crusading to have AI take over medicine.