• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    All these issues are valid and need solving but I’m kind of tired of people implying we shouldn’t do certain work because of efficiency.

    And tech gets all the scrutiny for some reason (it’s transparency?). I can’t recall the last time I’ve seen an article on industrial machine efficiency and how we should just stop producing whatever.

    What we really need to do is find ways to improve efficiency on all work while moving towards carbon neutrality. All work is valid.

    If I want to compute pi for no reason or drive to the Grand Canyon for lunch, I should be able to do so.

    • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Anyone with experience in corporate operations will tell you the ROI on process changes is dramatically higher than technology. People invent so many stupid and dangerous ways to “improve” their work area. The worst part is that it just takes a little orchestration to understand their needs and use that creativity to everyone’s benefit.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      lol at tech’s transparency. You have an availability heuristic issue with your thought process. Every other industry has similar critiques. Your media diet is leading you to false conclusions.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        We’re literally in a technology community followed by tons of industry outsiders, of which there is a similar one on every other similar aggregation site. I don’t see any of that for things like plastics manufacturers, furniture makers, or miners. So yeah, I’d say transparency for the general public tends to be higher in tech than most other industries.

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Efficiency??

      This is about the total amount of emissions, not the emissions-per-unit-of-compute (or whatever).

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not sure what you’re getting at. Increased system efficiency lowers total emissions or at least increases work capacity.

          • treadful@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Unless you’re looking to get rid of half of humanity and go back to living like the Amish I don’t think we can put that genie back in the bottle.

            What we can do is work on how energy is generated and increase efficiency. And this has nothing to do with shareholders.

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If I want to compute pi for no reason or drive to the Grand Canyon for lunch, I should be able to do so.

      Are you able to explain why?

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m sure I won’t be very eloquent about it but simply, liberty. Freedom of compute is on par with freedom of thought and expression.

        Freedom of travel is something else, but I’m sure most people that don’t like being imprisoned can appreciate.

        Work (as in energy expenditure) enables these freedoms and I think it’s important not to stifle that whenever possible.

        • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          “Hey fucker, your right to swing your fist ends where it collides with someone else’s face”

          ^ Dont make me tap the sign

        • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Computing and leisure travel aren’t human rights, while freedoms of thought and expression are.

          • treadful@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I just disagree. Computing is expression and in my opinion freedom of travel should be a human right.

            Even if you add “leisure” to it to bolster your argument.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Disagree that all work is valid. That only makes sense in a world with no resource constraints